User talk:Alegreen
About Bach[edit]
From the Bach page I linked to kunstderfuge.com/bach.htm since they have all MIDI files of Bach (c. 2,000 seems). You don't need to put other links: all Chorales and other works are inside the first site. Also note that from classicalmidiconnection you can't download any file. Please do not put redundant sites. :)
Have a good day. Tony 07:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, well said! :) Alegreen 07:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
About Bach[edit]
Kunst der Fuge is a commercial site. They sell MIDI files, and apparently they are all over Wikipedia. I have no problem with it if you allow KTF to spam the site, but to make them exclusive is a bit offensive.
The Classical MIDI Connection is one of the oldest and largest MIDI archives, with over 1,000 Bach files. This site is free, which makes it an alternative to Kunst der Fuge, so it's not "redundant". The files can be played and also downloaded (-), ask the webmaster if for some reason it doesn't work for you. If you guys keep removing the Classical MIDI Connection link from the Bach page it will eliminate a valuable resource for people who can not afford to pay for their classical music.
Have an interesting day. Midisynth 07:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[The date should be not corrected]
(-) This is not true. Alegreen 07:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Midisynth!
I really have no problem with the classicalmidiconnection. Only they do not offer downloading of files... why? And you call it a free website? However kunstderfuge.com seems to be not a commercial site as you say. They only requires, as wikipedia do and so many other website, and this just to survive, a contribution to save in costs (please read through the site).
In any case you should correct your link and description adding that files at cmc can not be downloaded. Alegreen 07:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
About Betulia Liberata, the libretto[edit]
Please do not dump source text, even if not copyright. Wikipedia is an enc, you need something like wikibooks for this , I imagine, thanks, jimfbleak 16:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK, will do shortly
- Sorry if above request seemed a bit brusque, jimfbleak 16:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Have you considered joining the WikiProject on Classical music? -- ßottesiηi (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Onclassical.gif[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Onclassical.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Blacksmith2 talkEditor Review 08:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Alegreen-small.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on Image:Alegreen-small.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Alegreen-small.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John Kaminski[edit]
A tag has been placed on John Kaminski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Pieter Bustijn[edit]
Could you reference this article, please? Ironholds (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Alegreen.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alegreen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:47, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alessandro Deljavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Alegreen, in 2006, on editing the article on Betulia liberata, you assigned the aria "Prigionier che fa ritorno" to the character of Giuditta, whereas it seems to be sung by Ozìa. I wonder if you would be so kind as to check. Thank you.--Jeanambr (talk) 16:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe it is sung by Ozìa only in the Jommelli version?--Jeanambr (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Alegreen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Clementi gradus ad parnassum 65 (c)simonetto.mid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Clementi gradus ad parnassum 26 (c)simonetto.mid listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clementi gradus ad parnassum 26 (c)simonetto.mid, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
The file File:OnClassical.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)