User talk:Aeonx/Archive/2020/June

Edit-warring on One America News Network

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

@Snooganssnoogans, again with the false warnings? I am NOT edit warring. Read what an edit war is. Firstly, I am no changing content, I am flagging an issue with an article as an experienced editor. Go read when to remove templates, and stop posting this crap on my Talk Page. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE. Aeonx (talk) 14:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

General sanctions for covid-19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 14:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for posting, Doug Weller. Now I suggest you go read WP:UNINVOLVED. Aeonx (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

I suggest you read Teaching grandmother to suck eggs. Doug Weller talk 16:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Walk the talk, Doug Weller. Aeonx (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

This is getting silly. If I revert you over something like that, I won't block you. But if you think that prohibits me from giving you standard alerts, you're wrong. Doug Weller talk 17:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

The only thing I said in regard to this standard alert was (1)A Thankyou, and (2)a request for you to review a particular relevant section of WP policy; the reason for which is that I was genuinely concerned based observations I had made from your past conduct that this *may* have been overlooked. Is it wrong for me to thankyou for posting on my talk page and to a make a suggestion?! Aeonx (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries, you may be blocked from editing. [1] O3000 (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

To be clear, I'm the one who is trying to progress toward improving an article. YOU are one of the syndicate that's disruptive editing !! -- Aeonx (talk) 15:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)