User talk:AGENT 7
Image tagging for Image:100 4007.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:100 4007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Little context in Faneromeni Monastery[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Faneromeni Monastery, by Silver Edge (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Faneromeni Monastery is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Faneromeni Monastery, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Revythousa. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Runner5k 14:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:100 4007.jpg[edit]
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:100 4007.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:100 4007.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:100 4007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
|
Your 'free' landscapes[edit]
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!
Sfan00 IMG 15:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The Windmills at the suburbs of Salamis city[edit]
The Windmills at the suburbs of Salamis city, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Windmills at the suburbs of Salamis city satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Windmills at the suburbs of Salamis city and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of The Windmills at the suburbs of Salamis city during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bullzeye (Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts) 09:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007[edit]
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Category:Articles for deletion. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Gscshoyru 12:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Please add more information and references if you can to this article. NB it is not a good idea to just remove the notice, as there is a chance the article will get deleted quicker. Tyrenius 10:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Guide to referencing[edit]
Click on "show" to open contents.
| Using references (citations) |
|---|
|
I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can removed unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started.
A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use Reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, authorised web sites, and official documents. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is Original research, e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research.
The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section. This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:
The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and after punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap):
Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference.
Copy the following text, open the edit box for this page, paste it at the bottom (inserting your own text) and save the page:
(End of text to copy and paste.)
You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For a book it might look like this:
An online newspaper source would be:
Note the square brackets around the URL. The format is [URL Title] with a space between the URL and the Title. If you do this the URL is hidden and the Title shows as the link. Use double apostrophes for the article title, and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). The date after The Guardian is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the web archive in case the link goes dead. Wikilinks (double square brackets which create an internal link to a wikipedia article) function inside the ref tags. Dates are wikilinked so that they work with user preference settings.
You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference
The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the <ref> code:
The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again:
You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! A short cut will only pick up from higher up the page, so make sure the first ref is the full one. Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them.
You can see refs in action in the article William Bowyer (artist). There are 3 sources and they are each referenced 3 times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is.
When you become familiar with the process, the next step is to have one section, "Footnotes", with links embedded in the text, and another, "References", which lists all of your references alphabetically with full details, e.g. for a book:
If you're ready to go into it further, these pages have detailed information:
I hope this helps. If you need any assistance, let me know. Tyrenius 10:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC) |
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Polychronis Lembesis, you will be blocked from editing. The article is currently unreferenced; the tag is there to show other editors that there is a problem to be fixed.Gordonofcartoon 09:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Salamis Island, you will be blocked from editing. The article still has no sources, therefore the unreferenced tag applies. Please cite sources, as required by Wikipedia:Verifiability, for the material you are adding. Gordonofcartoon 11:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Salamis Island, you will be blocked from editing.
Copyright status of Faneromeni Monastery[edit]
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Faneromeni Monastery. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.salamina.gr/english/faneromeni.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Faneromeni Monastery with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Faneromeni Monastery with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Faneromeni Monastery saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. Gordonofcartoon 12:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Punctuation[edit]
Welcome, AGENT 7. For your information, in English writing, it is customary to put a space after—but not before—commas (,) and periods (.). It is also customary to put a space on the outside, but not the inside, of parentheses and brackets. For example, "This (is how it) is done." It will be helpful to readers and other editors if you observe these practices in your writing. --Russ (talk) 14:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007[edit]
Sourcing[edit]
I hope we can avoid further edit warring over this issue - but please will you read the important policy Wikipedia:Verifiability. You have added a great deal of excellent material on Salamis-related topics, but it is required that editors provide sources for information. I've attached a guide that may be helpful.
Also, please can you stop removing maintenance tags. These exist to bring an article to the attention of editors prepared to help with improving it. If you keep removing them, you are likely to be blocked again, and perhaps even banned from editing, which is in no-one's best interest. 11:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Guide to referencing[edit]
Click on "show" to open contents.
| Using references (citations) |
|---|
|
I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can removed unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started.
A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use Reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, authorised web sites, and official documents. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is Original research, e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research.
The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section. This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:
The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and after punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap):
Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference.
Copy the following text, open the edit box for this page, paste it at the bottom (inserting your own text) and save the page:
(End of text to copy and paste.)
You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For a book it might look like this:
An online newspaper source would be:
Note the square brackets around the URL. The format is [URL Title] with a space between the URL and the Title. If you do this the URL is hidden and the Title shows as the link. Use double apostrophes for the article title, and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). The date after The Guardian is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the web archive in case the link goes dead. Wikilinks (double square brackets which create an internal link to a wikipedia article) function inside the ref tags. Dates are wikilinked so that they work with user preference settings.
You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference
The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the <ref> code:
The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again:
You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! A short cut will only pick up from higher up the page, so make sure the first ref is the full one. Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them.
You can see refs in action in the article William Bowyer (artist). There are 3 sources and they are each referenced 3 times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is.
When you become familiar with the process, the next step is to have one section, "Footnotes", with links embedded in the text, and another, "References", which lists all of your references alphabetically with full details, e.g. for a book:
If you're ready to go into it further, these pages have detailed information:
I hope this helps. If you need any assistance, let me know. Gordonofcartoon 18:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC) |
Removal of tags[edit]
AGENT 7, re the continuing removal of tags (as I'm sure the IP edits are sockpuppets). It has been explained to you why these tags exist. Your contributions are in poor English and need cleanup and sourcing by others who can read Greek and are familiar with sources. The tags are there to help find such editors. If you want Wikipedia to have good articles on Salamis, leave them alone. If you want poor articles, carry on - eventually this behaviour will lead to semiprotection of the pages and you will not be able to edit them from IP addresses at all. Gordonofcartoon 10:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Και τώρα... Καλώς όρισες![edit]
Γεια σου AGENT 7, και καλώς όρισες στην Αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια! Σε ευχαριστώ γεια τη δουλειά σου για τα άρθρα της Σαλαμίνας. Λυπάμαι που είχες στην αρχή καποια προβλήματα, όπως βλέπω από της προειδοποιήσεις και τους φραγμούς εδώ. Ηρθα όμως να σε παρακαλέσω να κάνεις λίγο περισσότερη προσπάθεια να συνεργάζεσαι με τους άλλους όταν σου λένε για κάποια λάθη που κάνεις. Έχουμε το πρόβλημα που τα Αγγλικά σου δεν είναι και τόσο καλά (όπως και τα Ελληνικά τα δικά μου...), οπότε τα άρθρα σου χρειάζονται αρκετες διορθώσεις. Επίσης είναι πολύ σημαντικό να είναι όλα τα άρθρα βασισμένα σε πηγές (βιβλία κτλ.). Όταν βάζουν "tags" στα άρθρα για κάποια προβλήματα τέτοια, μην τα σβήνεις.
Αν έχεις ερωτήσεις η θέλεις κάποια βοήθεια, πες μου εδώ η στη δική μου σελίδα, στο User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise. Τα λέμε, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Suggnomi pou sou eriksa fragmo tora, alla eixa tin endiposi pos dhen evlepes katholou ta minimata edho. Re, kapoioi exoun provlimata me ta edits sou, prepei na milisoume. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Memos Mpegnis[edit]
A tag has been placed on Memos Mpegnis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Memos Mpegnis[edit]
A tag has been placed on Memos Mpegnis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 12:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Memos Mpegnis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unnotable actor. Fails WP:BIO and [WP:BLP]]. Unreferenced and none of claimed works are notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)