User talk:ACupOfCoffee/Archive

Welcome!

Hello, ACupOfCoffee/Archive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --JAranda | watz sup 23:25, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Whoa

Big mistake on my part! Thanks for the heads up. Sorry about that. – ClockworkSoul 03:38, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

• Reverted myself. Thanks again. – ClockworkSoul 03:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

hey, thanks for the welcome. it makes a difference... --dr elys jimenez 04:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Good work!

Just wanted to say good work on the mass-tagging of images and it's pretty neat you met Ken Jennings. :) P.S. My favorite HSR toon is this one. "Put that freaking sandwich down." Cracks me up everytime. Westfall 23:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: They Might Be Giants

I'm glad that you have fixed the sourcing issues, but for future reference you don't have to ask the person who removed an article from the good articles list to give the "okay" to re-add it. What happens is, if you want an article you worked on to be added to the list, you add it to Wikipedia:Good articles/Self-nominations. Anyway, good work again on the references. Extraordinary Machine 21:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Every Breath You Take single cover.png)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Every Breath You Take single cover.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pagrashtak 20:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

MARTA

Yeah, I realized that after the fact that I changed it. But I had to go and could not return. Too much wordage. I guess I was kinda bored... Thanks for the input though. Much appreciated, as I am still learning.

TBC

No, TBC is not a reference to Homestar Runner and The Brothers Chaps (never really liked the series). It is, however, the initials of my name.--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 08:56, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

They Might Be Giants

I really like the They Might Be Giants article, but, personally, I think there are a fw too many Redlinks in it. but its a really good read! --Irishpunktom\^talk 11:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for your kind greeting. Blake's Star 21:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 21:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Help

I need help figuring out why an article was deleted. Everlife (Darthtuttle 19:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC))

Special:Log/delete&page=Everlife shows that the first time it was created, it consisted of the words "that girl is hot" and after that, everybody that created it wouldn't add more than a sentencs and a link to their official website with a stub template. Doin that is like saying "All right, I'm going to write an article." Then after one sentence saying, "Screw it, this is hard!" Adding a stub template to an article says that the article is short and really needs to be expanded, but you don't know enought about its subject to do it yourself, so you would like for someone who does to come and do it. So it's basically an admission that you really have no idea what you were doing when you edited the article. It's really better to delete article like that so that all links to it become red again and it's easier to spot as a needed article.

As to why it's still protected, I'm not sure why it's still protected. The user who kept creating it hasn't edited in almost two months and only has three edits total. I'm going to request it be unprotected. —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 20:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

I can't find how you got the information out of the log. I'm going to cantact everyone on the discussion page for that article. We can probably pull together sources and information to start with.

Yeah, that link totally didn't work. But, here's on I've verified does work. [1] —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 06:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Everlife

Yes I would. It seems like every artist has a page except for these amazing girls. Tcatron565

That was Darthtuttle that left that note, not me. —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 02:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello!

I just want to say hello. Have a good day. Anonymous anonymous 17:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Acharya S.

Why did you revert the Acharya S page? I know it may seem Im on the bad side, but if you read th ocntent, the Verison you reverted to Contaisn obviosu Bias. Notabely it omits a link. It says " At leats one Critic and several Dectractors from the apologist camp" to Neutralise Critisism. It claism ehr book has "Rave reivews" and goes on to say how rleigion is based on myth and is Ahistorical ( WHich is not WIkpeidas perveiw.)

Rather than asusme Im the big bad vandal, please read the articles in the History section. Acharya S has sent her fans from her mailign list to WIkipedia. Their aim is to advertise on Wikipedia. Your hoempage says you oppose this. So do I. Thats why I've been targeted so mcuh, and why Ive stuck to my guns onthis.

Please leave the Achrya S article alone, or else help me prevent it from beign used to defend her. OK?

ZAROVE 20:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, but NPOV says that rather than say "Some people say such-and-such," you should tell just who those people are. For instance, in stead of me saying "One person says you should type slower and use the "Show preview" button to proofread what you type." I should say "I say you should type slower and use the "Show preview" button to proofread what you type." That's more NPOV, and even more provable(sp?).

Rather than revert that edit, you should have looked into who that detractor is and who those detractors are, and seen if there are any more so that you could add to that statement. The article should be used to defend her. It should also be used criticize her. That's the heart on NPOV. Remember NPOV stands for Neutral Point of View, not No point of view. We want to show EVERY major point of view on all the subjects of our articles, not show absolutely no point of view. When we present a poin of view, the only thing about it we should show as hard fact is that it is actually held by people.

I hope that helps you see why I did what I did. —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 06:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Belated Happy Easter

Belated Happy Easter To You! Sorry for the late greeting! Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 00:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Figured I'd point out...

You have the 'Eagle Scout' userbox listed twice on your userpage. --69.145.122.209 03:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Good eye! — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 03:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

aaaaaaaaaw

goodness gracious me! please do not CRY ABOUT IT.

I'm not. I'm just enforcing the policy outlined at WP:VANITY#Policy_regarding_vanity_articles. Oh, and please sign your posts on talk pages. —User:ACupOfCoffee@ 17:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Jerry Springer

I never edited the Jerry Springer article.

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have identified yourself as an Anglican, and so I thought that you may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: 64.12.116.73

Thanks for letting me know. It's been blocked for 15 minutes. --Pilot|guy 00:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Ken Jennings

Just thought you might like to know that I've recently passed a Jeopardy! tryout with flying colors. I'm confident that I'll be called to be on the show some time in the next season, and if I do, I'll fly to Houston after I win great big heaping GOBS of money and let you take a picture with me. Then you'll know two famous people! Alan 03:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Help

I guess that at the head of the help list you get lots of help requests from wrinklies (a v.quaint oldie English English expression used to describe a pensioner). We quaint English prefer the term English English since it is our language rather than British English, and as they never tire of reminding us, the barbarous Scots and Welsh have their own languages. As for American English ... well ...you wanted to be independent but not so independent that you devised your own distinct and unique language. But you would always be welcomed back into the fold if you changed your minds. But to my prob with an uploaded image. I can't figure out how to correct a mistake in an uploaded title. It will be obvious when you see it. Image:Image-Polaris A3T RV toe-in and tilt-out.gif . Two Images is more than I can manage for breakfast at one sitting. Regards. Brian.Burnell 13:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Southampton.

A Question of an Image's Source

I have a photo that I know is copyrighted, but should be allowed as an upload to Wikipedia as a promotional image. I have not yet tried to upload the photo. My question is really about the source: I did not find it online but I also did not create it. It was sent to me via an email. How should I credit its source when I do upload it? Thank you! Doctor-of-fostat 18:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Part 2 Thanks for the speedy reply. The person that emailed the photo is the actually the photographer, but I don't believe he owns the images. I'm almost 100% certain that the company he works for owns them. Is it possible to credit the photos to that company as promotional material (which it is) if they aren't likely to use it on the internet? Again, thank you Doctor-of-fostat 05:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank You! Doctor-of-fostat 23:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Tag question

Since you are listed on the copyright tag page, I hope that you won't mind my asking a question. I want to upload an image taken from the South Carolina legislature's official website of a state legislator. Is there a tag for this? How should I cite it appropriately? Oh, and Homestar Runner is awesome. I particularly like Teen Girl Squad. "Ow, my most of me!" --Chuchunezumi 05:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I actually found the Wikipedia info on state websites and I'm contacting the SC website to see what is allowed. --Chuchunezumi 09:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Nice to meet you!

Hi, thanks for the nice welcome! --Ninevah 22:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Going out

Hey, sweetie. Will you go out with me? —Mariusz Zielinski 19:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

This is not the place to ask people out on dates. You did the same thing on Hilary Duff's talk page, and a) she's probably not here anymore. b) I don't think it would work out between you and her anyway. —Mr. Conrad 21:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I am so sorry

I thought you were the pretty lass - with her mate Ken! - Kittybrewster 21:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

No, I'm not! —Mariusz Zielinski 12:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Image Help, if you please

Hi. I uploaded an image

File:TheyFoundNemo.jpg

and I don't know anything about its source. It was sent by email in one of those chain-letter emails and I'd bet my life that the creator does not care about its copyright status. How should I 'tag' this thing so that everything's hunky-dory here in Wiki world?DocEss 17:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Where would you use it? Depending on that, fair use might be able to be claimed.

— User:ACupOfCoffee@ 17:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I don't know where I'd use it. But I've got all kinds of images I get through emails --- you know the kind, the funny ones somebody created and broadcast to the web through email - they circulate instantly. What do we do with those? Can we use those? How do we cite copyright status? Do I have to ask SlimVirgin's cabal before I can do anything on Wiki?DocEss 17:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

No, but what was the point of uploading it then? See WP:NOT. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 17:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The point in uploading what? Any image I get by email. I'm askking you waht to do with mass-emailed images. Why do you avoid answering the question? Please help. DocEss 18:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

In a way, I did. Unless there's a use for it somewhere, it should probably be marked for deletion. As for the creator not caring about its copyright status, they either have to officially declare that or enforce the copyright, otherwise after a period of time it falls into the public domain. As far as how to tag it, I'm not too sure. Sorry I can't be of more help than that. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 18:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

OK. I assure you there'd be a legitimate Wiki use, so you can stop guarding the gate --- I've read the policies. I think, then, the thing to do would be to ask somebody else how tag them. Thank you for your help today.DocEss 18:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Potato in 0.5?

I don't see Potato in the list for release 0.5. How does your specifying:

{{V0.5|class=GA|category=Everydaylife}}

on its discussion page become translated into actual inclusion in 0.5? RickJP 09:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I just hadn't added it yet. It's there now. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 14:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, OK. Thanks. RickJP 06:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Completing Version 0.5 reviews

Hi, and thanks for your help on V0.5 so far. We've made it over 1000 articles! Now we only have about four weeks left to review articles for Wikipedia:Version 0.5. I was wondering if you could take a look at Wikipedia:Version_0.5/To_do and sign up for something? I'd like us to make sure we don't miss anything important. And once the end of the month rolls around we can take a well-deserved break...! Any help you can give would be most welcome. Thanks, Walkerma 21:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

help

what correct copyright do i apply to an image sourced from an online article from www.topgear.com. It is a british-based motoring tv series/magazine owned by the BBC. thanks

From just skimming their terms and conditions page, I would suggest not uploading it (or if you have, marking it for deletion), but if you have to use it then one of the fair use tags will apply. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 05:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Sci Fi Channel (United States) programming block image thing(y)...

I was wondering since I'm going to go through the trouble of making a list of S.C.I.F.I. World shows aired with their corresponding themes illustrated through images such as this (or this), to whither would these images belong to as far as Wikipedia's image copyright tags go.

So far, I was thinking they might fall under logo (or perhaps character artwork {places can have character, eh?) and the webpage screenshot doesn't seem fitting due to the fact that it isn't the whole general sort of screen (rather: its segment). I do hope you come up with an answer that goes with my question but thanks in advance in any case if the otherwise. (I have a question on References too as far as time-slots go, but I'll save that for after this one) DrWho42 03:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Something to note: the corresponding web-site it was found off of has now went the way of the 8-track cartridge (Never to be seen again!). DrWho42 03:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Maybe promotional? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 05:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Ahh, okay. Many thanks. (= DrWho42 05:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Image Copyright

Is there anyway to copyright the image so that it can ONLY be used on Wikipedia? --Merhawie 01:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Nope, that would violate the GFDL. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 02:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Tony Martin (comedian)

Nice work on the cleanup of this wiki! --Mikecraig 22:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Adoption

If you are interested in adopting a user,please visit WP:ADOPT.

Why am I getting random messages all of a sudden? Am I being confused with someone else? You7 sure you mean me? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 20:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Please Help Me

I am wondering how to create extra pages for my user page without creating an article. I know I did this kind of thing before, but that was because I didn't know how to make it not an article. If you would kindly tell me how you did this, I will be happy to do it in the future. K.C. 15:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Is this what you want: Wikipedia:Subpages#How_to_create_user_subpages? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 18:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Siege Rhodes 2.1.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Siege Rhodes 2.1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 21:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright tags

If I take a screenshot of a program or website and upload it, what licence should it have? Do I choose it, or must the owners of the site/application choose it? Thanks, 0L1 - User - Talk - Contribs - 14:10 23 2006 (UTC)

It would more than likely be fair use, and in which case you'd want to use these tags: {{Web-screenshot}}, {{Software-screenshot}}, and {{Windows-software-screenshot}}. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 08:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Great - thanks. 0L1 - User - Talk - Contribs - 21:39 25 2006 (UTC)

NZ Knights

Please can you leave it when i change it. I know it doesn't seem very neutral to you but we are very passionate fans of the club. Bloc 5, here is a link to our website if you don't believe me. Please i want people to acknowledge our presence as passionate fans of the club.

Thanks in advance.

--222.154.7.219 08:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I believe you — it's just that adding it violates our original research policy, our guideline on conflicts of interest, and possibly our notability guidline.

If that comes across a little rudely, that's absolutely not what I meant at all. Edits of that perticular nature are usually flagged by another editor — in this case me — as either non-neutral or spam, and I suggest you have a look over Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View to see where I'm coming from. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 20:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Help

Hi, I saw your name at image copyright tags so I came here to ask; what tag should I use for this image?[2] I used picfindr which was recommended on public domain images for searching for free images. I read the terms and conditions of the website [3] and I think it would be suitable for Wikipedia. I'm not 100% sure so I'm asking :). Please could you inform me of which image tag I should use (or if it's not appropriate licensing for Wikipedia). Thanks, James086 ^{Talk | Contribs} 09:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Wow.... Thosee terms of use are as clear as mud. I would try asking at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Can I use... — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 20:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll ask there. :) James086 ^{Talk | Contribs} 06:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)