User talk:86.150.188.184

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 86.150.188.184, is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to British Telecom. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register).

Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.150.188.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked.i have done I lot of constructive edits to articles. Oh wait. My computer was hacked and was being used by another person. Sorry for the disruption. I'm making a new password right now. My other one was surcure. Someone must of watched me put it in I locked it and I went to get a coffee and when I logged back in again I saw that I was blocked. Sorry for everything that the disruptive user has caused. 86.150.188.184 (talk) 08:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry to here that. Unfortuantely, I don't know if this is you or that other evil person. Who could it have been? Oh, well. You have 31 hours to castigate them. Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.150.188.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked.i have done I lot of constructive edits to articles. Oh wait. My computer was hacked and was being used by another person. Sorry for the disruption. I'm making a new password right now. My other one was surcure. Someone must of watched me put it in I locked it and I went to get a coffee and when I logged back in again I saw that I was blocked. Sorry for everything that the disruptive user has caused. 86.150.188.184 (talk) 08:01, 22 July 2019

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So in the course of ten minutes some evil person took control of you computer and then you regained it. I think you are trolling. careful. I can just take away your talk page access. . Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was hacked. 86.150.188.184 (talk) 08:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.150.188.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes User talk:185.69.145.5 hacked me. I think He's blocked so he found another way to edit by hacking peoples accounts while there offline. It was not me I'm not trolling. I'm innocent. 86.150.188.184 (talk) 08:24, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If your computer is easily hacked, it needs to be blocked to prevent damage to Wikipedia. In any event, we still don't know if the person making this request is different than the person who made the inappropriate edits before. I would suggest that you request the creation of an account at WP:ACC to avoid problems like this in the future, though you can also wait out the block. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 331dot (talk • contribs) 10:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.150.188.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it was user:185.69.145.5 who hacked .me. I can't create a new account. 86.150.188.184 (talk) 15:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)86.150.188.184 (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are no grounds here to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can request an account, as I state above. 331dot (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.