User talk:84.176.239.161

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

84.176.239.161 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, It was my contribution to the George Papadopoulos page that has been repeatedly (seven times!) reverted by user Dr. Fleischman and his Alaskan friend. I have tried to make a cogent argument for my edit, and it has been repeatedly reverted without the merits of the edit being discussed on the talk page. Fleischman escalated this squabble to the "Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring" wherein he plays the victim, and I find myself blocked by administrator Coffee, even though there has been no discussion or decision shown on the Noticeboard. I ask that an administrator carefully review the edit history, and development of the talk page discussion, consider the tone and merits, confirm the validity of my edit, block Dr. Fleischman, and allow me to edit again. Thank you for your attention. 84.176.239.161 (talk) 6:22 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Valid edit warring block. I looked at the edit and source in question: the source clearly states "He says he speaks..." not "He speaks..." As was pointed out to you on the talk page of the article, if you have a source that says he definitely speaks those languages, please provide it. The statement in the article is not a NPOV violation because we are using the language of the article. only (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 84.176.239.161, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutrality^talk 17:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Neutrality^talk 17:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at George Papadopoulos shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 02:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 05:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:05, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.