User talk:82.23.69.143

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
@SuperMarioMan: Jenny Ryan was born in Bolton. She is nicknamed The Vixen and The Bolton Brainiac. --82.23.69.143 (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SuperMarioMan: Here is a source to prove she's from Bolton. https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/20280515.jenny-ryan-receives-honorary-doctorate-university-bolton/ --82.23.69.143. She says in the article: “I’m a Boltonian born and bred. The thing about Bolton is that if you call Bolton home once, it will always be home. Whether you live here or not, whether you have family here or not, you are all Boltonians." (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The time to add that reference was before you had to be reverted several times on the article. This IP address has received multiple warnings about referencing requirements. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 11:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've learnt my lesson. Can you please unblock me? --82.23.69.143 (talk) 17:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(I'm assuming that all the edits from this IP address since 2020 are by the same person.) Looking at your editing history over the last two-and-a-half years, I'm far from convinced that you have. I do not see how unblocking this IP address will prevent harm to Wikipedia articles, so I will not be unblocking it. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 18:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This IP address does not belong to me. I have been using this since 2020, and only recently, they checked the history and found out their IP was blocked. The owner isn't happy and is planning to fine me. Please unblock me? I will never edit Wikipedia again! --82.23.69.143 (talk) 18:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.23.69.143 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did nothing wrong. Jenny Ryan is from Bolton. 2025 (two years) is too harsh. --82.23.69.143 (talk) 00:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You added content not in the sources repeatedly. Two years is about right considering the previous blocks. PhilKnight (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.23.69.143 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry ok. Wikipedia is so damn strict. I've learned my lesson. I do not own IP address, and the owner is angry at me for getting their server blocked, and are threatening a fine if this IP don't get unblocked. Please unblock this IP address!

Decline reason:

This has been going on for years. Given that, just hours ago, you were claiming you did nothing wrong, I am not convinced. Yamla (talk) 11:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: So can I be unblocked? --82.23.69.143 (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously not. Stop trolling. --Yamla (talk) 20:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 PhilKnight (talk) 04:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]