User talk:71.178.166.126

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Frank Gehry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Anchor baby seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read the interview. She is being hypocritical, and I don't think it's biased to report that under a "controversies" section. One of the most outspoken critics of "anchor babies" was born to parents in the country on a visitor visa (her mother was already pregnant with her), and she demands that the Constitution not bestow citizenship on people . . . like her. Seriously, what's wrong with pointing out the fact that some of the people stirring up "controversies" are being overtly hypocritical??71.178.166.126 (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that both,

1). Your edit has no appropriate place in the article. 2). "Pointing out anything" with out reliable sources is original research, which is not allowed.

GorillaWarfare Looking through the contribution history of this IP editor, it is clear that they are not here to contribute in a constructive, and collaborative manner. Just look at their edit-warring, and refusal to get the point on Sylvester James Gates.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 02:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Boise City, Oklahoma[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Boise City, Oklahoma, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's in Ken Burns' documentary "The Dust Bowl". If you'd like to create a reference, have a party. You obviously have lots of spare time to spend policing a website.71.178.166.126 (talk) 02:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dirty Jobs episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Centibyte(talk) 02:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Foecke, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:51, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]