User talk:70.138.34.87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Vampires Suck, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. onebravemonkey 09:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. onebravemonkey 11:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2010[edit]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a collection of unverifiable speculation. All information about anticipated events must be verifiable as certain to happen, such as your addition to the filmography in Anna Faris of a movie that has not begun filming. Please do not add information about future events to infoboxes, succession boxes, discographies and filmographies. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Vampires Suck, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistant failure to abide by policies on verification and consensus building. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
By the way, I came to block you after reading this discussion of your edits at the admins' noticeboard for incidents. Olaf Davis (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Vampires Suck, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 02:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unsourced edits -- FINAL WARNING[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Saturday Night Live (season 36), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits -- FINAL WARNING[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Saturday Night Live (season 36), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Sean Bailey (producer), you may be blocked from editing. You MUST provided sources for anything you wish to include in a Wikipedia article. Scjessey (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pendleton Ward has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pendleton Ward was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://twitter.com/buenothebear) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 06:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.