User talk:63.138.92.98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


October 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kip Kinkel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kip Kinkel with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Jamesx12345 18:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kevin Ware has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

June 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Resident Evil has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

February 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Emergency power system has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of figures in nationalism because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 21:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hate crime has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hate crime was changed by 63.138.92.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880818 on 2015-05-06T14:39:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programming languages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 18:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Phil Knight , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of American Football League players has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patty Mills. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Patty Mills was changed by 63.138.92.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961914 on 2017-11-16T14:47:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Patty Mills, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Patty Mills. Ifnord (talk) 14:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

—Bagumba (talk) 16:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments: Blocked for 1 week.

Hans Market painting[edit]

I responded to your question at Talk:Hans Markart but your name came up in red, so I am not sure that you will get it. I am appending the original message below:

@63.138.92.98: If you want to include the image, feel free to do so. Wikipedia is open source- so anyone can edit at any time. See MOS:IMAGES for general advice on how to do this.
However, you should be aware the the article already has many images of Makart's paintings - for many editors it is too much already. Somewhere in WP's complex and confusing set of guidelines or policies there is a statement to the effect that 'Wikipedia is not an image gallery' - which is what editors use to justify their decisions to delete portions of articles with a large number of images. "Large number" is not defined anywhere in Wikipedia, in relation to any of Wikipedia policies which is problematic for editors (for example, the good folk over at Wikipedia External Links Project interpret it to mean anything more than one, in relation to the external links at the end of articles). I can't find that statement about too any images in the policy statement MOS:IMAGES which means that it is probably a guideline rather than a firm policy. In my own case, I have had entire galleries of images deleted from several articles because an editor considered that there were too many images, or didn't like the images selected. Of course, you can challenge such decisions, but in my experience it is a total waste of time because no editor ever backs down from editing decisions that they have made, and if you challenge them too vigorously, or use evidence-based arguments rather than rely on policy interpretation, they tend to engage in various vindictive editing tactics.
Given that the painting is expressly mentioned in the article, it is a good idea to include that image, but you would have to delete one or more images to make way for it - because of the current crowding on the page. Some editors might object to the removal of an image they have added previously. For prolific artists, such as Makart, it is not realistic to include every work for which Commons has images. You might have noticed that the article has a logo explaining that Wiki Commons has media relating to Hans Makart. Clicking on this will allow users to access a category with works by the artist or about the artist. Ultimately it is your decision whether to add or not to add another image, but I would suggest that you ensure that the painting of interest, Bacchus and Ariadne, is included in Makart's category on Commons. If not, you can add it to the category, or ask someone at the Commons help desk to do it. If it is already there, then I probably wouldn't recommend adding another image to this article, unless you use it to replace a minor work that is displayed on the page. I would not recommend adding it to the gallery, which is already at two lines, so the addition of yet another image would take it to three lines - where it would surely draw the ire from the image-haters.
Personally, I am in totally favour of images - especially images of artworks, sculptures, buildings and complex diagrams or flowcharts. But sadly, there appears to be an entire brigade of editors who see images as far too low-brow or "unnecessary for an encyclopedic understanding" of the subject, and only too willing to hit that delete button. Good luck! BronHiggs (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Agent00x. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Legs Diamond— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Agent00x (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Legs Diamond. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sammy Gravano, you may be blocked from editing. Jeb3Talk at me here 19:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to American Mafia. Aspening (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:63.138.92.98&oldid=883332165"