User talk:47.203.28.160

June 2022

Your recent editing history at Karine Jean-Pierre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm disappointed to see Muboshgu threatened you with a block for edit warring but not your counterpart, Hipal, who actually broke 3RR. If you would like to comment on Hipal's conduct, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Hipal_reported_by_86.171.219.109_(talk)_08:30,_7_June_2022_(UTC)_(Result:_) 2A00:23C8:4384:FB01:D80D:BD89:4048:812 (talk) 12:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I agree how do I report.

Here wp:ani, I would not if I wee you, Slatersteven (talk) 10:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SamWilson989. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hate speech, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In this particular case, you added something that was explicitly not in the specific source being quoted. SamWilson989 (talk) 01:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Discretionary sanctions notices

Hi IP 47. Please see the standard notices below about heightened conduct standards in sensitive topic areas. I know we're involved in a content dispute right now, and it's therefore hard for notices like these not appear hostile. I want to emphasize the "does not imply that there are any issues" part of the notice.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your editing to date

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

JUne 22

Please read WP:NOTDUMB and wp:bludgeon, it does not matter how many times you ask for an edit to be made, one request is enough, two is a misfortune....I will leave you to imagine what three might be seen as. Slatersteven (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I find this to be condescending and rude. I’m stating my point and talking to people on a post.

Please read WP:BITE

And I am warning you that we have rules, and that you are kind of breaking them. As I said, you do not need to say the same thing 3 times in a row, we are capable of reading your first post. This is especially a danger with race-related topics, where people may well take offense or get angry. The above warning and my one are here to let you know what policies you are breaking. Slatersteven (talk) 10:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---