User talk:2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989

August 2018[edit]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Gina Haspel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. wumbolo ^^^ 09:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Give yourself a break from this ridiculousness2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 09:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can't accuse someone of supporting torture, without evidence. Period. Even if you did have evidence, it would have to be published in reliable sources. Stop arguing (WP:IDHT). wumbolo ^^^ 09:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP already had language that McCain supported Torture in the US Senate. So how do you explain that? You seem to be confused with the text of the article and the edit summay. Have you bothered o review and find your disortion?2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 09:38, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverting implemented a grammatical error. Learn your craft.2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 09:41, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote a misleading edit summary. You can't use humor in that way. That's forbidden. wumbolo ^^^ 09:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was absolutely nothing misleaiung except to show how rediculous was the original statement that you never bothere to review before making your accusations.2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 09:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC) So have you just disclosed that a revert was made to a WP article without due diligence? And in doing so reinstated a liabolous statement into WP? And then decided that it was best to cast asspertions on others?2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 09:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's ridiculous is to think that the former sentence structure is libellous (not "liabolous"). wumbolo ^^^ 09:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your apology for acting in hast is accepted.2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 09:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At which point did I apologize? wumbolo ^^^ 09:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able to continue with your inability to understand that there was a misunderstanding as to what was done. I cannot comment any longer about your points of haste. You ar picking a fight where there is no reason to be one except for the original misundertsnading.2605:E000:9149:A600:803C:B302:3874:B989 (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.