User talk:2601:C4:C300:1BD0:609F:B35B:467C:A139

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2020[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at List of people killed for being transgender shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. © Tbhotch (en-3). 20:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Will you discuss your position on the article's talk page?--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:609F:B35B:467C:A139 (talk) 20:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Will you obtain first a consensus of a proposal you just made 20 minutes ago? © Tbhotch (en-3). 20:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Therefore, I am waiting for you and others to reply at Talk:List_of_people_killed_for_being_transgender#Guideline_for_inclusion.--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:609F:B35B:467C:A139 (talk) 20:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As it is a major change in the scope of that page, WP:RFC will be better. © Tbhotch (en-3). 20:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are very perseverant in reverting my edit, yet shy in commenting yourself!--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:609F:B35B:467C:A139 (talk) 20:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't limit the scope of the article. The scope of the article has been limited by others who remove my edit stating," In 2019, Brazil had 130 killings of transgender people, the most of any country."[1] These are the same people who removed 100's of trans homicide victim. Yet, you know that your position limiting the scope of the article is wrong. So, you don't want to be transparent about the guideline!--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:609F:B35B:467C:A139 (talk) 20:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And you keep rehusing to perform a community consensus through a RFC \__ツ__/. I don't care about what is included and excluded there, I'm merely watching that page against disruption due to its controversial nature, and as long as that page title is "List of people killed for being transgender" it will include people killed for being transgender. If somebody else removed your contribution, you had to look for a WP:DR, not me. © Tbhotch (en-3). 22:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]