User talk:192.176.203.10

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.

The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

June 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gavin Reilly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Exxy (talk) 11:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gavin Reilly, you may be blocked from editing. Exxy (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Bill Potts (Doctor Who).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex^TW 14:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, David Holliday, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Neil Warnock. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Middle management— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at IndiGo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019[edit]

Per the above notices, which have been conscientiously ignored:

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:1481:98D:717F:79FE:5A69 (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Zachary Schr. An edit that you recently made to Christopher Jullien seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! FiberTech (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tea bag. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:34, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Cawdron (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The issue outlined by the previous reviewer has not been addressed. Please do not resubmit until you have provided multiple published, independent sources. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Cawdron and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Cawdron, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 192.176.203.10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wayne Scholes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wayne Scholes was changed by 192.176.203.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944039 on 2019-10-17T10:13:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, List of 'Allo 'Allo! characters, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 14:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jacqui Abbott—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 10:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kapalabhati has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kapalabhati was changed by 192.176.203.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904273 on 2020-05-05T08:11:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Government of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 14:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Northwood Headquarters. David J Johnson (talk) 14:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.