User talk:185.167.52.108

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.167.52.108 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why this block? My change on the page (Game of Death and Category: Game of Death) has not been contested for a long time. Every now and then a rabbit pops out of the hat and repeats like a parrot: block evasion of seven years ago. But in the past my link (simple) was appropriate in the past. I don't want war but Wikilove (armony). I ask for only two changes, (only two links) and then I would like to leave enwiki. The reaction of other users to these two links is stupid. Can I ask for a link on these two pages? 185.167.52.108 (talk) 14:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you wish to leave, then just leave. Nothing is preventing that. If you intend to leave, then you shouldn't care about what any particular article says. 331dot (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear 331dot you have been very very very kind but the decline reason? 185.167.52.108 (talk) 16:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was only responding to your "I would like to leave enwiki" comment. If you don't wish to leave, that's fine too, then you will need to do the very hard work to get unblocked, which won't happen quickly. 331dot (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, excuse me and Thank you 185.167.52.108 (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Game_of_Death&diff=prev&oldid=1074947134 185.167.52.108 (talk) 09:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. Lectonar (talk) 11:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.167.52.108 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

It's unclear if you are claiming that modification was made by Ankith Kumar.S after they were blocked. If so, that's relevant but you need to show evidence. If not, it's not relevant. Nor are your other links, the links to imdb (which can not be used as a reliable source on Wikipedia) or the link to amazon, at all relevant to your block for violating WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I think you are confused. It is not difficult to verify with other sources. The encyclopedic sources are used to create the pages. But if you want to check the truth it's much easier. Even a child can verify that the film is produced by Warner Bros. and Concord Production Inc. 185.167.52.108 (talk) 13:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not relevant. You don't seem to understand how Wikipedia works. --Yamla (talk) 13:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I only made one change on that page. I have read very well the production of the film on IMDB, Wikipedia, commons, Wikidata .... All the pages in the world talk about the production of Warner Bros. It seems to me that you don't like reading 185.167.52.108 (talk) 13:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reliable sources are crucial for rumors. You can delete my modification but you cannot block me because I write a truth. And I didn't insist 185.167.52.108 (talk) 13:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yamla Can you see here: [...] I'm in the midst of preparing my next movie, Enter the Dragon a coproduction between Concord and Warner Bros., plus another Concord production, The Game of Death, which is only halfway done [...] (by Bruce Lee). From: A parting thought – In my own process in Bruce Lee Jeet Kune Do: Bruce Lee's Commentaries on the Martial Way, to: p. 391. 185.167.52.108 (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) You are blocked for violating WP:EW. It doesn't matter if your edits are correct. Please read the policy. --Yamla (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but my war only happened with Thibaut120094 who is a great provocateur and liar. This user was nervous because he found that my changes were correct. Later he wanted to take revenge 185.167.52.108 (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are very close to having your block extended for violating WP:NPA. --Yamla (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Am I??? Ok by 185.167.52.108 (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yamla: Death threats!!!???? Where is it!? When!? In my entire life I have never threatened anyone with death! I will report you to the postal police for slander and defamation. You can block me but please eliminate these falsehoods or I will call my lawyer. 185.167.52.108 (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
UTRS appeal #55562. --Yamla (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EW 185.167.52.108 (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Game of Death. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The link to the Simple English version in in the "Languages" list in the left-hand toolbar, David Biddulph (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC) Note that MOS:NOTSEEALSO says specifically that the "See also" section of an article does NOT include external links (including links to pages within Wikimedia sister projects). --David Biddulph (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.