User talk:142.150.205.250

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


July 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at John Quiggin. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Kim D. Petersen 00:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
And please do not call other peoples edits vandalism [1] - thank you. Please read WP:CIVIL. --Kim D. Petersen 00:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Timothy F. Ball. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Kim D. Petersen 01:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mass-reverts[edit]

Please stop mass-reverting several articles to inferior versions. This might be considered vandalism, and may get you blocked. Especially if other editors revert your edits, seek consensus on talk before reverting again. Thanks. --Stephan Schulz 01:03, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

who made you the judge of what's inferior and what's not?142.150.205.250 01:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mu. And please follow WP:CIVIL. --Stephan Schulz 01:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Linux. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Laugh! 01:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring and content deletion across multiple articles, inserting unsourced negative information about living persons, and incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MastCell Talk 01:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]