User talk:أبو السعد 22

Hello, أبو السعد 22, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 01:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, أبو السعد 22! I'm CASSIOPEIA. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Three Impossibilities concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Three Impossibilities, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Three Impossibilities[edit]

Hello, أبو السعد 22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Three Impossibilities".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jinn in Folklore moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Jinn in Folklore, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 15:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Jinn in Folklore (February 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, أبو السعد 22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

أبو السعد 22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not actual request but it is not fair to block someone because just disagreement and google translate أبو السعد 22 (talk) 04:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

أبو السعد 22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I blocked because I never gave source to axiomatic informations but actually I cited many of my contributions, I want you cited any source from old books that stated there is member called أبو السعد 22 will be deserved to be blocked, so you need to learn the logic from aristotle not all informations need to cited a sources, you don't need to block any new member just because he disagreed with old member except that member fire many edit wars or have hostility to others and that what I didn't do

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

أبو السعد 22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

as I said the block for edit wars, break the rules or hostility not for disagreeing with others. also not all informations need sources btw I cited even my trivias with sources

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand everything

but I don't think this fair blocked anyone because disagreement only

they never told me anything you can search in my talk page

you should to know the difference between axiomatic information and theoretical information

axiomatic like easy information (e.g. block someone) doesn't need any source

@NinjaRobotPirate:so please give me source that I deserve to be blocked

I won't accept any source but academic source

أبو السعد 22 (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

أبو السعد 22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read all rules, the disagreements is not disruption nor against rules, it is not fair to block someone because disagreement

Decline reason:

As per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1030#Continued_disruption. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am also want any academic source that stated "there is wikipedian called أبو السعد 22 deserve to be blocked"

you need to learn the logic only theoretical informations need source not axiomatic

by your logic block someone without source is not fair

أبو السعد 22 (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Given your trolling here (asking for an academic source that says you should be blocked) and via email (bragging that you will continue to evade your block), I've revoked your access to both. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Hey, I have a request, could you translate the "Jinn"-picture on the Jinn article (Imam Ali conquers jinn) to me? I tried but I really struggle reading Arabic and Persian writings on manusrcipts. I would like to check the context of the picture and if the creatures are indeed intented to be jinn. --VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

VenusFeuerFalle, this user has been indefinitely blocked with revocation of talk page access, so they will not be able to help you. And their editing is a problem; see this ANI discussion for why. I recommend reverting any of their edits at Jinn. Crossroads ^-talk- 05:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks for the advice. Well, this surprises me, since we recently had some good exchange about Arabic words and phrases. The user has not done any edit on the Jinn-Article, however. But knew they is fluent in Arabic, therefore I asked them.--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I was looking forward to learning the difference between a demon, an imp and a hell monster. Sure is a fine line in English, if ever a line at all. Either of you fine folks know? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to find out what all the different hell monsters were. But he wouldn't tell, so he had to be globally locked. Crossroads ^-talk- 05:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, like Hordak. I forget how other sorcerers managed to keep in touch with him despite all that, but it happened there and it can happen here. So soon the secrets of hell shall be ours, my shadowy new yet strangely familiar casual acquaintance! InedibleHulk (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Jinn in Folklore[edit]

Hello, أبو السعد 22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Jinn in Folklore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Shayatin[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Shayatin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]