This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WARTORIOUS.
Notability: Not everything that is worthy is also notable, and the other way around. If there exist no good sources on a subject, then it should not have an article on Wikipedia. Even if sources exist, an article is still not justified if there is no encyclopedic information. For instance, if all we can say about a certain person is that she likes coffee and cookies, sings hymns, and lived a long time, then any useful information is better contained in a list.
Be brief. Don't use 300 words if you can say the same thing in 30. This is not about removing information, this is about presenting information.
Not everything that can be sourced merits inclusion. Don't include trivial stuff, this is an encyclopedia, not Facebook. Even if, for example, we would have sourced information that Einstein preferred his coffee with two lumps of sugar, that is not encyclopedic information that in any way increases our understanding of him. This means that existing text often needs pruning and rewriting.
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promoting your company/journal/band/etc. Articles should be encyclopedic, meaning that articles should be presented in a neutral way. Words such as "famous", "renowned", "foremost", etc. rarely have a place in an encyclopedic article. Hence, our Einstein article starts with "Albert Einstein was a German-born theoretical physicist", not "Albert Einstein was the most famous scientist ever", even though one certainly will be able to find reliable sources saying so.
Deletion/Inclusion. I don't see myself as an inclusionist or a deletionist. Everything depends on the sources. If there are good sources, then an article should be written. If there are no good sources, then an article should be deleted.
JCR: According to the ''[[Journal Citation Reports]]'', the journal has a 2011 [[impact factor]] of 0.506.<ref name=WoS>{{cite book |year=2024 |chapter=JOURNALNAME |title=2011 [[Journal Citation Reports]] |publisher=[[Thomson Reuters]] |edition=Science |accessdate=2024-05-27 |series=[[Web of Science]] |postscript=.}}</ref>
JCR with ranking: According to the ''[[Journal Citation Reports]]'', the journal has a 2011 [[impact factor]] of 0.506, ranking it xxth out of xxx journals in the category "CATEGORY".<ref name=WoS>{{cite book |year=2024 |chapter=Journals Ranked by Impact: CATEGORYNAME |title=2011 [[Journal Citation Reports]] |publisher=[[Thomson Reuters]] |edition=Science |accessdate=2024-05-27 |series=[[Web of Science]] |postscript=.}}</ref>
PubMed, reference for inclusion: <ref name=PubMed>{{cite web |url=CATALOGURL |title=JOURNALNAME |work=NLM Catalog |publisher=[[National Center for Biotechnology Information]] |format= |accessdate=2024-05-27}}</ref>
.svg){kind=small}
