User:the ed17/Archives/9/A

My great thanks!

		Milhist Coordinator elections
		Thank you very much for your much appreciated support in the recently concluded September 2008 Military History Wikiproject Coordinator Elections. I was thoroughly surprised to walk away with a position of Coordinator. Thank-you for your support, and I assure you that I will do my best to serve this spectacular project well. Esteemed Regards, Cam (Chat) 00:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Notre Dame de Lorrette Cemetary - Arras, France

hey!

Signed your guestbook! Will you sign mine?--Spittlespat! ǀ T ♦ C ♦ S 01:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Romaioi

I never had a problem with the guy really, I just got kind of frustrated that after it all died down he raked it up again. (I figured he wasn't doing himself any favours.) As you can see from recent events, none his fault, there has been a deliberate attempt to implicate him again. Thats the sock puppeteers style, he tries to involve editors he thinks might be sympathetic to him. Justin talk 15:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

That sockpuppeteer is a reeeeeal jerk, isn't he? Ugh. —the_ed17— 17:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Cheers Ed

I haven forgotten about Shannara. I've been chilling from Wikipedia and have a massive deadline to make at work, plus we are moving house in a few weeks (lots of prep involved). Its an unkanny coincidence that I browsed my talk page yesterday and found some comments from the sock. Unkanny more so because its the second time, from memory, that I have looked at a page after a break to find fresh comments by him/her. Cheers Romaioi (talk) 16:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Oof. Good luck, my friend, with all of the RL events....

Don't worry about Shannara article here on Wikipedia until you've taken care of all of that...Wikipedia will be here after you move! (Don't feel bad because you said that you would help and you can't; RL events take precedence over Wiki matters, I know.) Cheers! —the_ed17— 17:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey mate, cheers again. Looks like I managed to find time to do some stuff yesterday anyway. I was left to take care of the bub for the day and got lots of practice typing with one hand. In regards to Justin's comments above. He certainly means well, I agree, but there has been a persistent mischaracterisation of my actions and unacknowledgment of all evidence that clearly shows that I did not do what others say (including the small things such as reverting sock edits). False accusations, WQAs, ANI's, MFQ's etc have been equally frustrating for me. Particularly when most of my contributions have been in the form of adding citations, references and the like. Justin was certainly right about me being in the wrong place at the wrong time - it was a matter if that and the accuser not looking closely enough. One of the topics that the socks keep harping about is one that does need addressing. Unfortunately, the behaviour of the socks has severely tarnished the topic. Equally unfortunately, others who may know something about the topic and attempt to contribute run the risk of automatically being labelled as socks themselves. Whilst Justin justifiably feels that the socks are responsible for most of the grief I experienced, I feel that they are only partly responsible (their "attempts to implicate" me were plainly obvious). Most of the responsibility lies squarely with my accuser. At any rate, I am certainly happy that Justin has his eye on the latest attempts of the socks - it will prevent a third accusation against myself. Cheers Romaioi (talk) 11:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, just don't worry about sockpuppets anymore. =) Just go out and have fun on articles that you take an interest in! If you keep focused on those accusations, it will slowly begin to ruin your 'life' on Wikipedia... Anyway, good luck with the kid :D and I hope to talk to you soon! Cheers, —the_ed17— 19:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:71.107.160.15

It's OK. He can remove his warnings. All he's gonna do for 72 hours. Unless someone extend the block, of course. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 23:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Lol okay then. =) —the_ed17— 23:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Carrier Air Wing Six

Please make sure the tables in Carrier Air Wing Six have cites, so I can award it GA. Wandalstouring (talk) 08:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, ed7! Hope all is well. I have revised the tables in Carrier Air Wing Six with the appropriate footnote citations.Marcd30319 (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi! Yeah, everything's fine (for the most part)! I left a note on Wandal's talk page telling him that it was done. =) —the_ed17— 18:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Operation Strikeback/GA1 Review

Thanks for the heads-up! I am wading through the GA1 review. Most of the issues I am confident of resolution, but I am concerned about the citation issues for the warship lists. I get in touch when I get to that stage. Marcd30319 (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Alright, just tell me where I can help, and I'll be there. Cheers! —the_ed17— 18:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello! I have addressed the various citation and quotation issues in the [Summary talk section]. The big question is citing the various ships and aircraft listings. The GA1 reviews assert that the [method of citation] does not conform to MOS standards. How can this be done correctly? By individuals citaton for each ship and air squadron? You suggestions, please. Marcd30319 (talk) 13:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Edits to USS West Gate (ID-3216)

Thanks for catching the missing s in your edit to USS West Gate (ID-3216). I beg to differ, however, on the applicability of WP:OVERLINK to the word materiel. As I'm sure you are aware, materiel is a specialized term that, while familiar to those of use who edit and write military history articles, is not necessarily familiar to non-MH readers. I've found in articles that I've written and/or those that I watch, that when it is not linked, it often gets "corrected" by well-meaning editors who confuse it for a typo of the word material. By the way, if you're using a script to look for overlinks, I'd suggest removing materiel from the list. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay! =) Thanks for not just changing it back without telling me, because I would have kept de-linking materiel whenever I saw it! :D But no, I'm not using a script; I just remove terms whenever I see them, so occasionally I may be wrong... Cheers! —the_ed17— 16:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't want to interject myself into this discussion, but the use of materiel is approprite when used in conjunction with the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy; when used with the U.S. Navy, the appropriate term is material. Marcd30319 (talk) 11:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

In the context of this article, where "West Gate took on 6,700 tons of cargo that included locomotives, steel rails, and other materiel for the United States Army …", I believe that the correct word is being employed, though I'm not sure I understand the distinction in your remarks. — Bellhalla (talk) 12:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Very good point. BTW - the article is excellent. Marcd30319 (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

You are right, Bellhalla. Thanks for correcting me. =) —the_ed17— 19:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Carrier Air Wing Six

Carrier Air Wing Six has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. —Mattisse (Talk) 17:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The ed17, I have addressed the above concerns to the best of my ability. Cold you review and as needed, do any clean-up for the fotnotes? Thanks! Marcd30319 (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Am doing now. =) Cheers! —the_ed17— 23:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks for your assistance. I read the latest GA reassessment comments. It looks like that Mattisse is not persuaded by the expanded narrative or the coninued incorporation of the extant tables and lists. Do you want to pull the trigger for the WP:GAR review? Marcd30319 (talk) 17:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Peer Reviews and Assessments News

Glad to see you take that position as you seem to deal with that section often so you would know what is going on there. I usually close the newsletter to info on last day of month and try to get it delivered within the first week of the next month so will try and remember to let you know. Boylo (talk) 05:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: FAC for USS Nevada

Ealdgyth already responded to some points. I'll head over and respond to the rest after I do a little bit of research on the sources. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 12:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Armor? I don't think I changed it, but I'd've relied on Fitzsimons as cited. Not to say that can't be wrong... (His tech editor was Anthony Preston, who I'd rely on generally.) The NYT piece does contradict, but I frankly would want a better source, say Jane's, before changing it; mainstream media aren't notorious for getting tech specs right, especially so far back. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 03:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Glad to be of service. And good hearin' from you again. Hope you had a good couple weeks. Ta. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 03:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey! You! Yeah, I'm talkin' to you!

Hey Ed! I'm back! :D :D :D

So...has Darth Vader or his son murdered you yet? (quite bloodily, I assume?) —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 03:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

You scare me... please don't stalk me. :)

Not yet. I used some ysalamiri to hide from the Darth yesterday....but it's only a matter of time... =/ —the_ed17— 04:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Ooo...massive violation of WP:BEANS. *dons camouflage and scours internet for "Eds" in Michigan*

Oh, Ed's a bad name, though, don't you think? You could be confused with this eddy or, even worse, this Ed. —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 04:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

LOL way to drag Wikiguidelines into a serious conversation!!! :D

...not talking to you... (meaaaan.) =) —the_ed17— 04:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Not talking? Aw...I'm wounded! *staggers away pitifully*

What? *BOOM*

Whaa! It's Darth Vader! I'm doomed! —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 04:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

YES! MY INFERNAL EVIL PLAN WORKED!!!!

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!

Where is the Holy Hand Grenade? We must kill this evil black-clad monster!

On a side note, why a "boom"? Wouldn't it be a "shhhhhhrrrooom" as he activated his lightsaber? —the_ed17— 04:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

All right, sue me. I never was a fan of Star Wars, so how would I know? :) Meh. —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 04:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

...you've watched it, right? No need to be a fan—who forgets that sound effect???? =) —the_ed17— 04:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

All right, you got me...I never watched it. *gasps from all around* I was too busy admiring and watching teh awesomest piano pwner I ever saw and dedicating my life to replicating his awesomeness. :D :D :D Just remember: I'm not a space geek; I'm a musique geeque. ;) —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 04:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Anyhow, I'm going to bed now. Feel free to catch and spread my highly contagious case of idiocy to everyone else on teh wiki. ;) —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 04:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

*GASP* nooooo... You've never seen it? BLASPHEMY! Seriously though, you have to see them! They are "staple" movies!!! Holy cow... =)

Ooooo special pianist. Well, I guess that everyone has their own tastes and interests... (no, I don't really like classical, thank you xD...I happen to like "Piano Man" by Billy Joel though!

Good night! I'm going to bed too...1:15 a.m. here =/ ...but I'll try to spread the idiocy!

I was wondering if you were going to see that edit summary... —the_ed17— 05:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

No classical, eh? I getcha - I used to be ambivalent about it, too. But...now, I hate to sound like those evangelicals who try to convert every secularist they see, but have a looksee at my favorite piece ever. You may or may not like it, but I'm curious to see what you think. Tell me your honest opinion afterward, please. :) And you can also tell me if I'm being a pushover for this... —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

(outdent) :D Pretty cool. Not something I listen to every day, but every once in awhile it is awesome to hear that. Amazing how people can ecen play that! O.O No, you aren't being a pushover—if you like classical, you will probably like that. =) —the_ed17— 21:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

SR-161

History has been added, redlinks removed --Admrboltz (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Morgawr William Goldsmith Uhl Belk Urprox Screl Massey-Omura cryptosystem Ramesses VI Paranor ExamDiff Pro Taiki Matsuno The Elf Queen of Shannara Kendermore List of Latin words with English derivatives The Druid of Shannara The Talismans of Shannara WOOT-LP The Scions of Shannara Ford Island Lori Ann Cole The Great Wars

Cleanup Pick and roll Richard Rusczyk List of Nevada state highways Merge D. Wire Newman Piranha Plant Atlantic Ten Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Locations Add Sources Shannara Druids Ankh-Morpork City Watch Evan Williams (blogger) Wikify Shannara family tree Sphynx (cat) Remittances Expand Transportation in West Virginia Fantastic art E-123 Omega

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

MilHist + Novels shared task force

my original comment, left on Kevin's talkpage

"Seeing the interests of the_ed17 above it would be nice to co-ordinate with WP:MILHIST more and maybe get a joint military novel / short story literature task force on the cards." Hmm not a bad idea! There are a lot of military history novels...Tom Clancy comes to the forefront of my mind, with Dale Brown, Alistair MacLean, Stephen Coonts and Joseph Heller next in line..... [and we might get more interest in WP:NOVELS... :)] Anyway, cheers! —the_ed17— 15:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

If you think this is a good notion how best do you think we should go about it. Does MilHist have any similar group currently. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 15:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

I've got class now; I'll reply in an hour. Cheers! —the_ed17— 15:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Alright, class got out early. MILHIST does have a similar group...I didn't think so, but then I spotted the War Films task force they share with the Films WikiProject. —the_ed17— 16:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

So we would need to promote the idea of a War fiction task force or something closely similar. Needs to be named to be a conjuction of the two projects interests. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 16:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm that is kinda awkward though...maybe "Fictional War novels task force" or "War novels task force"? —the_ed17— 16:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC) "Novels of War"? —the_ed17— 16:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

My thinking was to include all lengths of fictional narrative prose, inclusive of short stories, novellas and novels etc. Also "novels" are nearly always treated as fiction so both would be "almost" redundant. Unfortunately naming is important so we should get it right first time if we can. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 19:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Alright then, I suppose that accuracy is better than a slightly awkward choice of words, so I'll propose it at the [{WP:MILHIST]] talk page. Cheers! —the_ed17— 19:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Should we wait and get people interested first? —the_ed17— 19:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead and propose away. We need to get the ball rolling. How about MilHist. Perhaps we start it with tight MilHist style scope and then apporach about a sharing, or should we approach first? :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 07:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if MILHIST would do a task force like this....."Note that the project generally covers only those depictions for which a discussion of historical accuracy or real military influence is applicable. A distinction is therefore made between fictionalized depictions of historical warfare and purely invented depictions of fictional warfare; topics sufficiently divorced from actual history that a discussion of actual military history would no longer be relevant to them—such as futuristic warfare in Star Wars—are not considered to be within the project's scope. However, songs and music with long military associations—for example, It's a long way to Tipperary and Lili Marleen—are within the project's scope." (WP:MILHIST#SCOPE) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Agreed I would see SF and alternate history as separate to the scope of this group. In other words fiction based on real wars, real conflicts albeit fictional accounts (with some invention). So I don't see we should have a problem. Military themed stories might be more tricky. Drama based and Sandhurst or West Point for example. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 07:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks ever so much

Award moved to user page =)

Aw shucks Thanks...but I'm just trying to help! =/ —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Award moved to user page... :D

What is this, award day? Thanks guys!!! Good luck with more Washington State Routes to GA! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Bloody Murder, Part 2

The Discussion (not part of episode)

All right...so what have we got here? How about this episode be centered on edit summaries? Since, of course, they are only used for the most serious of occasions. :D :D :D —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 01:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and I think I've found another one of my trademark infringements...

You're having a bad influence on your adoptees, dude. ;) —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 01:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, we'll try it. =)

:D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It was a test to see if it would work!...i.e. if his menu was missing a piece of code or something... But you released it under the GNUDFL (or w/e the acronym is) when you saved it, so =p ! and the next edit is me undoing that edit....you coveniently didn't mention that...:) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

All right, it's done...and look - it ends in a cliffhanger. Oooo.

But I think the first one was better, no? With much more spontaneity. An' lookiez, i spelz dat witout de fierfox! :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It's special. :)

Ya, but sequels never seem to measure up to the originals, do they... Oooo you are SO special. Takey a lookzee ad da nome ad irk.... (I tried to do weird spelling, but just in case, the translation is "Take a look-see at the gnome at work") —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

What say we do a little real editing for a bit...sound good? Maybe Alaska-class battlecruiser or USS Nevada (BB-36)? </spam> Which could be, might be, the two that I am working on right now. :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

The episode

Ed, I need help! Oh, someone save me! My head has imploded out of pure frustration! The automatic edit summary mechanism in my preferences didn't work, and my last edit went unsummarized! Now, when I go through my contribs via Wannabe Kate's, there's that annoying thin red line in my normally perfect sea of green! 'Tis truly maddening! Oh, what shall I do?! </damsel in distress> —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 03:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

If your head imploded, how can I help? You're virtually a chicken with your head cut off! and then there is the small problem that you are lying...(I looked at your contribs...)

Secondly, since when have you been a "damsel" Ms. I'm a tuff gangsta Pianista! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Chickens can run with their heads cut off. Pianistas can sign guestbooks with their heads imploded. Simple as that.

The damsel façade is for this episode only, Ed. So are ya gonna help me or sit around and add "Nerd site(s) for people interested in battleships"? —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 03:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, sure, but chickens can't think. No they can't.

Oh sorrrry. And nice link...meeeeeean. :D

Anyway, I'll ride in on a white stallion with a jousting lance to save you! I will run down that red line and spear it through its evil heart, and it will be gone forever, never to return. Is that a dangerous enough quest for you, Lady Pianista? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

'Tis nothing but delightful Bloody Murder! By all means, run - I am starting to suffer the effects of headlessness, albeit slowly. —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 19:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

*Charging red line* AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH CRACK! *Lance shatters* NOOOoooOOOooo I have failed! The red line has no heart, and so my holy lance could not pierce its non-loving soul! What shall I do, m'lady? Oh wait, you have no head, and you are dying...is this a bad time to ask? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Exceedingly bad time. Carry on. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

...I asked you to help, and you say "carry on"? Thannnnnks. =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

I mean, carry on with your mom. :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

(ourdent) But...but...but...I like Stacy's Mom better!!! :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

"Ourdent"? Your dent. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Your MOM'S dent. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Ow. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S)

Yep. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed}

Nope. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed}

No way in heck. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S)

What?!?!? =/ —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Pianista IS out of her mind!!! I'm soooo confused... =D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 00:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

(indent) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Piano players are kooky. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 00:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Shoot, Wikipedians are kooky, dude. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 19:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Heck, your mom is kooky. :D & =p —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 19:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Your mom's mom. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Your face. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Don't have a face because my head is imploded. (remember?) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Huph. Fine then, your non-existent face =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

My non-existent face due to your non-existent chivalry. :D :D :D Note that the smileys are only nominal - this is not usually possible for faceless pianistas to accomplish irl. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

"Non-existent chivalry"? I'm hurt. Truly, I am, m'lady. I risked my life to charge that thin red line, and now you insult me? ='( —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

You more or less deserved it. Not only did you stop your defense for no reason, but then you come along, flinging mother insults at me.

Not very gentlemanly, is it? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

(your piano's dent) Well, there was a reason—your head was cut off, and so you are going to die anyway. Why should I risk my life to please someone who will be dead in a few minutes? ...and it's not like you can hear the insults that are being thrown at you! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

I can't hear them, but my computer's speech system will read it to me. And my touch-typing is superb - one googol of words per minute, if you were planning to ask. Thus, my communication with you is almost completely the same as to begin with. And, you ask, why am I not dead?

In my early years (beginning from the day I first took my piano lesson) I have been drinking the elixir of life. So sue me - I am virtually immortal. My head implosion only causes a slight discomfort...but ladies were meant to be fussy about little things. So slay that red line - I command you! —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 01:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Ahhhh I see.....Stephen Hawking-like.

LOL na the REAL elixir is Journey. =) Slight discomfort; as in Jack Jeebs? And I, if you remember, I asked for help from you, as my holy lance could not penetrate the heart soul of the "beast". :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

...You told me it had no heart. Get your info straight, Sir Ed. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 02:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Oops, I meant soul. Better? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 03:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Better for the gnome...but not for the pianista. KILL IT! —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 03:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

• Ed obediently charges the red line with nothing but a shattered holy lance* *Red line morphs into the Rabbit of Caerbannog and stikes* *Ed's horse is killed from under him* *Red line almost makes Ed like Pianista and comes inches away from taking off Ed's head* *Ed RUNS AWAY FOR HIS LIFE!* 03:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Tune in next time to find out what happened to Ed...on Bloody Murder! Check your local wiki-listings.

And cut! —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

New sig

Hi, nice signature. But there's no link to your main userpage?!?!?! Good luck running for president BTW ;) Chamal ^Talk ± 02:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I try. =) No link to my userpage 'cos the HTML would get too long...! Cheers, —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Rock the vote

Serves you right for trying to steal an election. ;p David Palmer ^{stop thief} 15:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

14"/45 caliber guns

As a battleship fan and a coordinator I feel that I too have a stake in Nevadas FAC, even if only by extension of the virtue of the fact that I work with the project :) One advantage to having written most of the battleship articles for the Iowa class is that I know a few sites that have reliable info on the various aspects of battleship weaponry. navweapons.com is an outstanding reliable source for the guns used by most US battleships, so if you plan to write more battleship articles it may be a good idea to bookmark the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomStar81 (talk • contribs)

Thanks Tom (I think that it's you, you forgot to sign and I'm not going through the history.) I'll actually reply to this message later...RL issue to deal with. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

...As for the DYK hook, I am not picky, "whatever works", thats my motto. And you deserve some of the vredit since it was your Nevada FAC that compelled me to write the article. I'm not picky about who gets the credit either :) TomStar81 (Talk) 01:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

College-related Wikibreak

Thought I'd drop by and say congrats. Good luck on your journeys, and may you have a wonderful life ahead of you.</mushiness> :)

:D :D :D La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the smile, 'cos BOY oh BOY did/do I need it... —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

GA review on Operation Strikeback

Please mind my comments on the article, otherwise I have to fail it. Wandalstouring (talk) 08:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Ed is on Wikibreak (as indicated by his tag), so it's very likely he won't be able to mind your comments until October 12. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 16:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi Wandal. I'll get to it as soon as I can. I shouldn't be on this right now (Why? See the next two sentences.) Anyway, I've got a serious RL issue that was just dropped upon me when I got here, but I'll be back on Sunday/Monday. The only reason why I am on now at home is because my mom let me on to talk to Pianista... Anyway, my apoligies, —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 21:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Note

Pst! Have you forgotten Bloody Murder? ^^ —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 21:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. :) I'll reply now. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 21:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Award moved to my user page. :)

Well now, THIS barnstar looks familiar.... :D Thanks! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 19:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I wonder where I saw it before! Ollie Fury _Contribs 19:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For your help at Ulster Defence Regiment. Much appreciated. Thunderer (talk) 23:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem! I apologize if anything I did was wrong—I don't know anything about the regiment. =/ Guilty as charged, Judge. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Sometimes NOT knowing is best. That way what you do is totally neutral and that's what that article needs more than anything at the moment - neutrality. Like a lot of articles connected to the Irish Troubles it's been the subject of a lot of controversy. Sometimes I wish I knew nothing about the regiment either LOL. Thunderer (talk) 23:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

=) Good point. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: USS New Jersey

Actually I agree with the IP rational, we really should not be editting the intro too much since readers who look at the mainpage article and read the article in its entirety expect that the summary on the main page and the intro to the article will be mroe or less the same. I would be willing to reconsider the change after the passing of the article though, since the limelight will have passed and the intro will not need to be kept consistant for the TFA blurb. Would that be fair? TomStar81 (Talk) 19:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

No, it's really no problem. =) I just wanted to know which one you liked more, and I about to revert back to my version just because it is mine! Good luck tomorrow, and I'll help with any vandalism I see. Cheers! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 19:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

After New Jersey leaves the mainpage it will be nessicary for us to check all the article linked to USS New Jersey and ensure that no subtle vandalism crept into them by means of the USS New Jersey article. Are you willing to help? TomStar81 (Talk) 19:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure! That will be fun... :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm off to bed, but I'll be on as much as I possibly can tomorrow in order to keep an eye on it. Cheers! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Dol Guldur

Dol Guldur has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Davémon (talk) 21:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank You!

Award moved to userpage. =)

Thanks Tom! I was only too glad to help. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 02:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

USS Nevada

Just saw USS Nevada (BB-36) was promoted to FA. Congratulations on that! Chamal ^talk _work 14:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

It was? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 14:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh my gosh! I missed it on my watchlist!!!! Thanks for the thanks Chamal! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 14:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Award moved to user page...!

Congrats! I am in awe of you being able to take that article up the development scale all the way to FA so quickly. It gives me hope for USS Texas (BB-35) when I eventually get around to it after the Iowa class FT drive. -MBK₀₀₄ 14:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I spent a lot of time on Nevada...that's the only reason why it was so fast! Awe is not warranted! :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 15:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar—it was a pleasure to work on a ship article at FAC. Incidentally, I just came across a review for a book on Nevada that was published earlier this year. Not suggesting it as a source or anything; just thought you'd probably want to read it :) Maralia (talk) 04:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

O.O I think that I might! :D :D :D :D Thanks! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

One thing you learn about moving articles through the assessment scheme is that when the time comes to go through GA, A, and FACs you are never really ready, you are just sort of prepared, and s/he who is more prepared is s/he who is poised to succed. In any case, thanks for the award. :) TomStar81 (Talk) 07:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I see that now. =) Thanks again for everyone's help! The first battlewagon outside of the Iowa's to be featured. Finally, some variety! :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

bloooody murder episode 3

• walks slowly towards my house* (doesn't realize something is tracking him down) LALALALAALA HAHAHAHA I love this day! *meeeow* wait a second... IT"S THE KILLER CAT!!!! NO NOOOO!!!!!! HELP! ED17 LAPIANSTA!!! EEEEK! we will return after these messages!

Is your skin icthy well get this new lotion recommended by dermatoligists! GET cetaphil back to the show

SOMEONE HELP ME!!!!!!!! What will happen next find out when lapiansta comes...--Spittlespat! ǀ T ♦ C ♦ S 01:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

We may continue this...just wait a few days Spittle. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 17:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

lol

That was one of the best blooooody murders yet! Can I be in the show too?--Spittlespat! ǀ T ♦ C ♦ S 17:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Spittle...we don't even know if we are going to continue it yet! Hold on for a time! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 17:11, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hold on - Per Ed. We're working on our respective serious editings - Ed with his battleships and me with my music. A third season is still a question mark...perhaps in a month or two, if ever. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 21:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah...sorry Spittle. =/ And Pianista—Nevada is a battleship, but the Alaska's are battlecruisers....get it right. :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey guess what you guys are working on battleships and music, while I'm working on all 13 Series of Unfortunate events book! I have to admit the people who made those articles were written poorly!--Spittlespat! ǀ T ♦ C ♦ S 01:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

You may want to join this then, Spittle: Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Lemony Snicket task force. =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 01:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

...Nope.

Uh-uh. Not "FAIR AND FREAKIN' SQUARE!" Perhaps I should put "TRICK PAGE" in big red letters...

Sorry! Keep lookin'. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

...that is meannnnnnnnn. meannnnn. -_- Argh, ok, I will. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 04:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for 14"/45 caliber gun

Moved to awards page.

Wow, this must be your lucky month! :D :D :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 17:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Just 'cos you are only a gnome and don't get DYK's, GA's or FA's.... =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 17:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Ouch. That hurts because it's true.

But maybe not. I gnomed Madman Muntz several days before it got FA. So do I get credit? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 18:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I had to come back with something. =/

A bit...this and this show that they weren't all minor edits. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

No! Don't apologize! If my memory doesn't fail me, I've treated you far worse. :) —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 20:18, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Well.....yeah, you have, haven't you. =) In the interest of calling a ♠ a ♠, you are MEAN. EVIL, I tell you... :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, mean I can understand, but evil? What grounds do you have for that?

...Thou hast hurt the Pianista's feelings... ;_; —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Murder is evil, my dear... " ...'Twill accomplish what we like to call - soupe d'Ed." Remember that edit summary? Well, now it has come back to haunt you. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

So has this edit summary: "*Ed's twitching hand gets closer and closer to the switch that will turn the infamous Pianista into a block of frozen carbonite...not unlike Han Solo.*"

So I guess in the end, I'll be a block of frozen carbonite and you'll be a...soup. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 22:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

(out/in/piano's dent) Ooooo was not expecting that answer..... Ouch. Well, I'd rather be dead than be stuck in frozen carbonite, still alive....though death by falling pianos would hurt a bit... :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

You have to be a toon to drop a piano on somebody. :x Judge Doom ^{take a dip} 04:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

...

WikiThanks

Thank you
for reverting the vandalism on my page.

Kinda out-of-place considering me being "evil" and all...

But seeing as I give this to everyone else, I suppose you should get this. :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 20:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. =) Nice and easy with da Twinkle. You are evil...just not all of the time though! Thanks! —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 20:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gtstricky

You currently have a double !vote in the RfA, one a "weak support", the other neutral. Everyme 23:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Apparently, I was on the fence more than I thought...staying with the ""weak support" for now...I can't believe I forgot that I had already voted...pathetic. Don't say anything Pianista. Nothing at all. You hear me? ;) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

What? What's that? I think I'm hungry for WP:BEANS... —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

...-_- I told you explictly not to say anything..... :D :D :D :D —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Precisely. I didn't say anything...I typed it. —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

A minor technicality...the principle is still there. :) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

And since when were you a gentleman of principle? You left me to die, headless, remember? —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't like your tone young lady.... =) And it was your fault that you were headless. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

(out/in/your mom's/my piano's dent[s]) Well...I suppose you're right. You did, in effect, "charge that red line with your lance" upon a "white stallion." Knightly...in principle... :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 23:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

No, just chivalrous. =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 23:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Couldn't resist.

Had to send you this.

La Pianista ^(T•C•S) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd the WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburger, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk puj with friendly messuj.

—La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 04:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)