The Rokeby Venus is a painting by Diego Velázquez which was completed between 1647 and 1651. It depicts the Roman goddess Venus in a sensual pose, lying on a bed and looking into a mirror held by her son Cupid. The painting is the only surviving female nude by Velázquez. Since 1906 it has been in the National Gallery in London.
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RAJIVVASUDEV.
RV is my pseudonym, and I am a textile professional and an avid reader with a strong interest in learning about new technologies. I have a passion for both historical and modern textile subjects, and the majority of my editing work focuses on topics related to textiles.
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are. — User:Ian.thomson
There are two types of general topics lists: Outlines and Indexes. Outlines are arranged hierarchically, while the topics in indexes are presented alphabetically.
The vast majority of lists on Wikipedia present the items of a class of things – those are item lists. The rest are general topics lists which are different than item lists because they present the subtopics of a given subject – their scope is an entire subject.
For example, for sharks, the item list is List of sharks and it presents shark species. A general topics list on sharks is the Outline of sharks, and its scope is everything about sharks.
Blend (textile) The fact was ... that in the 12th century, when wearing pure silk was forbidden for Muslim men, a silk-and-cotton blend known as mashru solved the problem?
Revenge buying The fact was ...that revenge buying after the lifting of a 2020 COVID-19 lockdown helped a Hermès store set a record for the most shopping at a luxury outlet in China in a single day?
Caffoy The fact was ... that caffoy was a fabric similar to cut silk velvet, made from wool and often used for decorations such as hangings and draperies?
Lucy Adlington The fact was ... that after publishing a fictional account of women who survived a Nazi concentration camp by sewing dresses, Lucy Adlington was contacted by descendants of actual dressmakers?
Care cloth The fact was ... that during the time of the Church Fathers, thevelatio nuptialiswas used by the church to validate the sacrament of marriage and emphasize its importance?
Fashion psychology The fact was... that fashion psychology is an interdisciplinary field that studies the interaction between human behavior, psychology, and fashion?
Echte Wagner... that an album of collectible cards from the German margarine brand Echte Wagner in 1930 presented a vision of the future that incorporated concepts such as wireless personal phones with screens?
Great work on adding to and helping to preserve Bolt7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your efforts in building up the encyclopedia. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The Christianity Barnstar
Dear RAJIVVASUDEV, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of care cloth. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 08:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
No, you have to be kidding me. Every single person who signed this petition needs to go back to check their premises and think harder about what it means to be honest, factual, truthful.
Wikipedia’s policies around this kind of thing are exactly spot-on and correct. If you can get your work published in respectable scientific journals – that is to say, if you can produce evidence through replicable scientific experiments, then Wikipedia will cover it appropriately.What we won’t do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of “true scientific discourse. It isn’t.
Nicely done. Wales is essentially saying, we have standards. Deal with it.[2][3]
.svg){kind=small}
