User:Merovingian/archive-29

Nomination for deletion of Template:Packers1995DraftPicks

Template:Packers1995DraftPicks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Rob^Talk 17:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Windows 97 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows 97. Since you had some involvement with the Windows 97 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Green Bay Packers WikiProject

Hi Merovingian! I just wanted to let you know that I have restarted the Green Bay Packers WikiProject. Come check out the page and if you are still interested, add yourself to the active member list! All of our articles have been assessed and there are a lot of new tools available to help us improve Green Bay Packers articles. Please feel free to post on the WikiProject's talk page or on my talk page if you have any questions! Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Good Will Hunting 2: Hunting Season listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Good Will Hunting 2: Hunting Season. Since you had some involvement with the Good Will Hunting 2: Hunting Season redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

List of African territories and states by the date they succumbed to European imperialism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of African territories and states by the date they succumbed to European imperialism. Since you had some involvement with the List of African territories and states by the date they succumbed to European imperialism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sheila Fougere for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheila Fougere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Fougere until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Merovingian. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Merovingian.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Merovingian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Merovingian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Tsistekeriia'kón:ke listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tsistekeriia'kón:ke. Since you had some involvement with the Tsistekeriia'kón:ke redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Football club redirects

I see you're creating redirects for football clubs without articles. Is there a consensus on this? They're being redirected to league articles which contain no information about the clubs in question, and will have to be updated as and when the clubs are promoted or relegated, and now one can't tell at a glance which clubs have articles and which don't. I don't see that it's particularly helpful. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Vospers Oak Villa F.C. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vospers Oak Villa F.C.. Since you had some involvement with the Vospers Oak Villa F.C. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Alphington A.F.C. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alphington A.F.C.. Since you had some involvement with the Alphington A.F.C. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - TheMagnificentist 15:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Traditional name for Epsilon Capriocorni

Hi, I have seen you created the article for Epsilon Capricorni. I have observed that since the first edit (yours) it states that the star bears the traditional name Kastra. However, I did not find any source for that. I will remove the name unless a reliable source is added. You can comment on its talk page if you have one. Thanks! Eynar Oxartum (talk) 06:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Atmail for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atmail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atmail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Merovingian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Touch Fuzzy, Get Dizzy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Touch Fuzzy, Get Dizzy. Since you had some involvement with the Touch Fuzzy, Get Dizzy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Resistance force for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resistance force is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resistance force until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Aëry listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aëry. Since you had some involvement with the Aëry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wow! City!

The article Wow! City! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage, fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of breakfast cereals for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of breakfast cereals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breakfast cereals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 19:13, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sing Along in Hebrew

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sing Along in Hebrew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

15 years of editing!

Hey, Merovingian. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Merovingian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

AquaRx™ Water listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AquaRx™ Water. Since you had some involvement with the AquaRx™ Water redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

7440-34-8 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 7440-34-8. Since you had some involvement with the 7440-34-8 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ComplexRational (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)