User:Amorymeltzer/dash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion[edit]

Total CAT:SD → 16 (Purge this page) (Current time is 19:34)

Sysop intervention[edit]

WP:AIV 2,145

Reports[edit]

Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]

WP:RFPP — CLEAR!

Backlog CLEAN!

WP:UAA 3,701

Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]

Administrator backlog

Administrative backlog[edit]

AfD debates relisted 3 or more times
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requested RD1 redactions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

Permissions[edit]

Rollback 1,993

Rollback[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Adam Black[edit]

I think I have a strong history reverting vandalism and would like to request rollback rights in order to use Huggle. I already use UltraViolet and Twinkle and I think rollback/Huggle will improve my ability to tackle disruptive editing. Adam Black talk • contribs 12:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Florificapis[edit]

I meet all 4 criteria. I spent most of my time on Wikipedia creating content and have never engaged in edit warring. Rollback would help me perform my patrolling tasks more efficiently, since I do NPR and AfC work from time to time. Florificapis (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

PC reviewer 4,434

Pending changes reviewer[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:RowanJ LP[edit]

I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:RITWIK MAHATA[edit]

I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Imsaneikigai[edit]

I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

User:750h+[edit]

I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello User:750h+ . Nice seeing you here! From a quick look at your contributions, it seems like you usually don't leave a warning when reverting vandalism nor an semi-automated edit summary. It's very easy to do with tools like WP:Twinkle. Could you start warning editors? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh, nice to see you here to. :) Noted. 750h+ 12:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Boneless Pizza![edit]

I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

User:GoldRomean[edit]

I think I have a decent understanding of Wikipedia's policies. I've monitored recent changes and have mostly reverted vandalism whenever I see it, trying my best to always warn them. I think that being a pending changes reviewer will help me continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. GoldRomean (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Whisky and more[edit]

I have been registered for some time now and have recently gotten into more regular editing and monitoring of recent changes and pages that come up in publicity or news to check for currency and any wayward or malicious edits or mistakes. I have a good understanding (and am always learning and improving) of the basic and relevant policies for pending changes reviewer permission. I'd love to help make Wikipedia a better place for everyone by supporting pending reviews! Whisky and more (talk) 11:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled 8,011

Autopatrolled[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Prince of Erebor[edit]

I have created 80 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Lectonar (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:SheriffIsInTown[edit]

I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

With all due respect to this user, I would suggest admins look at User_talk:SheriffIsInTown#Unreferenced_articles_drive. Mach61 06:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:MinorProphet[edit]

Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Eagledj[edit]

I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Monhiroe[edit]

have created 80 articles and to create more in the future. Monhiroe (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

User:KingEdinburgh[edit]

I regularly create military bio articles. KingEdinburgh (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TrimmerinWiki[edit]

As part of NPP, I've noticed the high quality work of TrimmerinWiki, with similar supportive statements on their talk page. Their pages are well-developed and researched. Klbrain (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Sanslogique[edit]

Hello. I would like to request Autopatrolled rights on the advice of user Broc, who appreciated my editorial skills. I have created more than 140 articles, mostly music-related. (I also have these rights in Russian Wikipedia.) Sanslogique (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

I stumbled across Sanslogique's music-related articles more than once as part of NPP, and found them of high quality. They show understanding of WP:NMUSIC, their pages are well written and sourced, and I did not see any copyright problems, that's why I suggested them to apply for autopatrolled rights. Broc (talk) 14:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

User:CharlieMehta[edit]

I am requesting autopatrolled rights for the second time to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia. My previous request was denied due to a lack of editing experience in biographical pages. Since then, I have focused on improving my expertise in this area. Since then, I have focused on improving my expertise in this area. I may not meet the criteria based on quantity, but I hope my work demonstrates the necessary quality. Charlie (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Losipov[edit]

I'm applying for autopatrolled rights for a second time, with my first request being denied in April 2023. The reason for that decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability". Since then, I have worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and have had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I add a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). I feel like I have learned from what I was doing wrong, and in the process, I have made dozens more articles since the decline. Therefore, I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Ednabrenze[edit]

I regularly create new articles until I took a break to focus on work and studies. I have now concluded the studies and have retuned to creating new articles. I am requesting this right to help bring down the large number of articles waiting for reviewers attentions as articles I create will no longer join the queue if this is granted. Ednabrenze (talk) 02:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Dobbyelf62[edit]

Meets minimum criteria, appears to never have had an article of their's deleted. Mach61 07:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer 34,075

New page reviewer[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Florificapis[edit]

I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [1]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again.

I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 00:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Within the past several days, I have been active cleaning up new articles listed at NPR. I am also an active member of WikiProject AI Cleanup. Having a few more tools would help me speed up the process and do a more comprehensive job. Florificapis (talk) 15:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy ping for @Hey man im josh, who had reviewed my initial request. Florificapis (talk) 20:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Ideally I'd like to see a bit more experience in deletion and/or AfC, but I'm willing to grant a trial based on your content creation record.  Done for the usual two month trial. – Joe (talk) 13:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:InDimensional[edit]

I would like to participate in the NPP backlog drive.

  • I have experience creating new pages as well as participating in AfD discussions.
  • Never had any blocks.
  • Agree to review on a trial basis. InDimensional (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done for the usual two-month trial. Thanks for volunteering and sorry for the delay in processing this request. – Joe (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:TarnishedPath[edit]

I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann‎. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann‎ but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann‎ just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann‎ to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy ping to Rosguill, as they granted the trial perm. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done  Done, sorry for the delay in processing this request. I think that the trial review and AfD track record is sufficient for indefinite renewal. 14:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)signed, Rosguill talk

User:Trainsskyscrapers[edit]

Hello. I was initially given a month long trial as a new page reviewer after receiving an invitation on my user page, and I've been enjoying everything so far: reviewing pages, providing feedback, sending WikiLove to new and returning users who have made exceptional first attempts, tagging issues, and resolving issues myself (that could otherwise be tagged) when I have time in an attempt to reduce the backlog. I have already been renewed once, and my second trial expires in a little over two weeks (May 26th). I'm requesting either an indefinite or longer-term ability to review new pages before my time lapses. Haven't had any behavioral issues, and I try to treat all users with respect. I will continue to help clear the backlog in the meantime. Thanks again. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 00:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done for the most part track record looks good, although I do think you made the wrong call at Upcoming Anuel AA and Ozuna album signed, Rosguill talk 14:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Ixtal[edit]

Forgot to re-apply before the permission ran out. Would like to continue participating in the drive as well as afterwards. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy ping for @Hey man im josh as the granter of the trial perm. The Night Watch (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Ixtal, I see that you've marked only 5 pages as patrolled as a new page reviewer, which doesn't really give much of a track record to look at. I'm personally willing to give an extension for a month so that you can develop more of a record to go on, but I'll leave this open for another admin to look at. The Night Watch (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done, 3-month extension granted signed, Rosguill talk 14:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Aszx5000[edit]

I was turned down last July 2023 as being too early. I have since increased my article (incl. BLP) creation, and have done major overhaul and expansions of important topic articles here. I remain autopatrolled on Wikipedia and WikiCommons, continue to participate in AfD, and have done some PRODS. Am willing to learn the NPP process. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering,  Done for a 2-month trial. You are encouraged to re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Rahammz[edit]

Hello. I had the new page reviewer permission but for some reason it was taken away without any explanation. I would like to apply for it again or at least get the reasoning for the removal of my permission Rahammz (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Basically I would like to have a longer term as a reviewer. If the time had run out Rahammz (talk) 01:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. First, I'll note that the prior conferral of this permission was provisional, intended as a trial run, which can be seen from the log statement--it was not removed, it simply expired. That having been said, on reviewing your track record, you approved articles with clearly-inadequate sourcing at Draft:Georgi Tasin (previously in mainspace) and Stanislav Přibyl, and did not tag or otherwise note some rather egregiously non-neutral language at Michael Dóczy and Signe Zeicate signed, Rosguill talk 14:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:The Sharpest Lives[edit]

I noticed there is a backlog at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, so I'd be happy to help! The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 16:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done for a two-month trial signed, Rosguill talk 14:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Pbritti[edit]

Hi! I was granted a one month trial with the NPP right and feel as though I did a decent job. I mainly focused on marking obviously acceptable articles. I didn't do a ton of reviewing, but I then again I felt like doing more than a handful a day would have been overstepping the constraints of a trial permission. If it is ok with the coordinating admins, I'd like to keep using the NPP right; feel welcome to simply renew the trial period for another month if you need more indication that I'll stick to procedure. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done track record looks good for the most part, although I think the wrong call was made at Presidential standard of Northern Cyprus, and Lorenz Metz should probably have been tagged with {{sources exist}} as no secondary sources are cited in the article (although they do exist online) signed, Rosguill talk 14:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Xoak[edit]

I was suggested to apply here, and I've decided to volunteer. To make this more consistent:
I'm an AFC reviewer and I mostly create articles and review articles relating to biographies, as well as biological or scientific topics. I have DYK, GA, and vast experience with AFD and other noticeboard discussions. I'd like to volunteer in new pages patrolling as well to help reduce the queue. (I most likely won't be reviewing pages daily, but whenever I do, I'd do a thorough review, and I'm very collaborative. I provide feedback and at times amend issues myself of the pages I review).
Note that I've had a name change, so certain stats tool pages might not work properly. And 3 out of 4 of my deleted pages were self delete.

Thanks.
X (talk) 04:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Babegriev[edit]

Was hoping to contribute with working on the backlog here. I have rollback and have been working on RCP, but looking to expand my experience a bit. Not much to brag about with new article creation, but there's a limited sample there I stand behind. I'm decently acquainted with the AfD scene, and have been working with new (often problematic) users and editors as best I can from RCP. I was removed from probationary AFC due to inactivity, but I'm planning to be online more in the immediate future. Also have worked with copyvio patrol and have done the oddball GA review. Looking forward to help, and happy to discuss any questions. Thanks! Bgv. (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done, work across AfD and article creation looks good, no need for trial. signed, Rosguill talk 15:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Tajotep[edit]

I always wanted to review new pages since I became familiar with Wikipedia and had a good behaviour. I also got motivated to post this request when I was granted to the autopatrolled user right without applying for it (an administrator decided it voluntarily). I'll check specially the last pages on "New Pages", which are at the end of the queue, to improve those articles and helping new users by telling the mistakes they have. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done for 2 months as a trial run signed, Rosguill talk 15:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! Tajotep (talk) 22:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Melmann[edit]

Requesting either an extension or permanent permission, as my 1-month trial is due to expire within approximately 7 days. I've participated in the backlog drive, not as much as I had hoped to due to IRL commitments, but I've received no negative feedback so far and given the size of the backlog (despite the drive) it appears that help in this area is needed.
Pinging @Spicy as a courtesy, given they've granted the trial. Melmann 20:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Spicy (expires 15:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done. I'm fine extending this trial a bit longer if you feel you didn't get enough time to give it a go. Extended for 2 months. Please re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:IgnatiusofLondon[edit]

I was a new page reviewer until earlier this month. As my curation log suggests, while this wasn't the focus of my wikiediting, I occasionally dipped into the backlog to review new articles, a fair few of which I draftified or sent to AfD (so they weren't all easy!). I think my reviews were adequately accurate to demonstrate my suitability for the permission, and I'd like to continue helping to reduce the backlog as my wikiediting time allows. Thanks! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy ping for @Red-tailed hawk, who first offered me trial permissions. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
@IgnatiusofLondon: I'm afraid your draftify log raises several questions:
  1. User:Russellmorden/Economics of Gold was technically outside of WP:NPPHOUR, but from the edit summary and placeholder sections it should have been pretty clear that the creator was still working on it (see WP:DONTDRAFTIFY#5). Wouldn't an {{unsourced}} tag have been sufficient?
  2. Draft:Belarus–Maldives relations has 21 inline citations for less than 50 characters of prose and two tables, yet you draftified it as "needing more sources". On the creator's talk page you specified that what was missing sources discussing and explaining the international relations between Belarus and the Maldives, not simply side-by-side fact profiles about the countries' basic information. What is the policy basis for excluding an article lacking such sources from mainspace?
  3. Draft:Battle of Orurillo was also draftified for lacking sources. Why was the {{unreferenced}} tag, already added by another reviewer, not sufficient? Did you note that there is a Spanish article on the same battle that does cite sources?
  4. Also on Draft:Battle of Orurillo, this is a clear attempt to revert your draftification. Why did you move it back to draftspace, instead of mainspace?
  5. Did you not notice that Draft:Recapture of Fort Vaux had previously been moved to mainspace by the creator, and was thus ineligible for draftification per WP:DONTDRAFTIFY#6?
  6. Draft:Recapture of Fort Vaux is a lengthy article, apparently translated or adapted from fr:Reprise du fort de Vaux, with 121 inline citations. The reasons you gave for draftifying it include an essay-like tone, overuse of primary sources, and possibility of a merge. Why could these issues not be addressed in mainspace?
I do appreciate that you took the time to leave specific feedback for the creators of each of these articles, rather than only relying on the script's canned reasons, but I'm worried that you are applying a significantly higher standard to new articles in mainspace than the community expects from new page patrol, and would appreciate it if you could reflect on your approach before any extension of the NPR right. – Joe (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Vestrian24Bio[edit]

Reason for requesting: I've been following up with the NPP & AfC backlogs. There are still 9200+ articles and 28600+ redirects to be reviewed. There are also 2900+ pending AfC submissions. I want to volunteer for helping out in reviewing new pages and AfC submissions to reduce the backlogs. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 15:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process or evaluating content. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1[edit]

Hello, I will like to request to be giving the rights of a new page reviewer, I’m an experienced Wikipedia editor and I’ve worked on different articles, I wish to be giving a trials so I could support the community, thanks. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process to feel comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:ToadetteEdit[edit]

Trial ends June 16, and backlog drive is nearly over. I am reapplying early since some requests may not be answered after two weeks from now. I would like to review more pages and hopefully clear down the backlog. I have reviewed more than 100 articles so far and only very few were unreviewed. Please consider my reviews and AfDs before processing my application. ToadetteEdit! 18:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 18:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

User:PK-WIKI[edit]

Experienced editor wanting to contribute to the new page backlog. I was recently granted a trial and did review some pages during that time, but I believe the trial has now expired. Requesting permanent New Page Reviewer permission based on those reviews and my experience in page creations and deletion discussions. PK-WIKI (talk) 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

@PK-WIKI: As far as I can tell you only reviewed two articles during your last trial. I don't mean to be rude—every review helps—but how do you expect us to make a judgement based on that? I can grant you a third trial, but are you honestly going to use it? – Joe (talk) 13:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
A third trial would be appreciated. Part of the problem is that I apply for the permission, wait X days for it to be approved, don't notice it's approved as I'm busy doing other things. Then the moment I wanted to review has now passed and the trial eventually expires. I will hopefully do enough to have it set permanently this time... PK-WIKI (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:CosXZ[edit]

I have 547 mainspace edits, have a registered account for 8 months and 22 days, good reputation with many editors, created a mainspace article, have a good understanding of guidelines, have done a few good article reviews, and have no blocks. Cos (X + Z) 22:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process to feel comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Cossde[edit]

I have been editing for over 15 years, contributing over 1,000+ articles and 27,000+ edits. Lately got into a bit of bother over a topic area. Therefore, want to direct my energies to a new area and contribute to Wikipedia as a New page reviewer. Cossde (talk) 04:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done, thank you for helping out. – Joe (talk) 13:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Mdann52[edit]

Permissions previously removed due to inactivity, reqesting restoration following work over at AFC - trying to get back into the content game, so will be looking to improve pages as well as review. Mdann52 (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

That's strange. NPR isn't usually subject to an activity requirement. Anyway, welcome back.  Done for the bot. – Joe (talk) 13:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
@Joe Roe: see WP:NPPREVOKE, the right is typically removed after a year of inactivity. —Ingenuity (t • c) 13:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, I must have missed that. – Joe (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Grabup[edit]

Hey, I have done much AfC reviewing, reviewed over 430 articles, and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to demonstrate my understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines. I was advised to gain more experience with the deletion process, and I believe I have done so. My previous PERM was declined, saying that my AfDs were SNOWING, which I have since addressed. I think I am ready to review new articles. There is a very big backlog, and I want to help reduce it. GrabUp - Talk 13:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3][4]). — MusikBot talk 13:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. You have been told by two administrators to wait a couple months before requesting this permission. Please listen to their advice. —Ingenuity (t • c) 13:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
@Ingenuity I asked them there Whatever, you said, “Just develop a meaningful track record.” Does that mean I don’t have a good track record now? Are my AfD participations still WP:SNOW, or have I engaged in deeper discussions to show my knowledge? I want to know where my main problem is!, But they didn't replied which is the reason my PERM here, I want to ask you the question. Can you answer please? GrabUp - Talk 13:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Yesterday, after you sought feedback, Extraordinary Writ told you to wait. You later reached out to The Night Watch who also did so. Your efforts are appreciated, but when people tell you to slow down and keep working at it, you should do so instead of ignoring the advice given to you. You've mentioned tagging articles, but I think you're missing a lot when you try to do so, so perhaps get more familiar with the possible maintenance tags that can be added. Also, I dislike that you're accepting your own AFC submissions a minute after creating and submitting the articles (Rajpalsinh Mahendrasinh Jadav, Hemant Joshi (politician), Anita Subhadarshini), it unnecessarily inflates your stats. If you plan on immediately "accepting" your own submission then just create it in main space. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I tried to reply to this without reloading the page and saw that Ingenuity had already done so. Leaving my comment but removing the not done template, since Ingenuity has that covered. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
@Hey man im josh: I saw an admin doing it, which is why I do it too. However, these articles were only created today or yesterday. GrabUp - Talk 13:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
@Hey man im josh: Can you respond to what I said above? If I had been given an answer to my question there, I would not have come here. GrabUp - Talk 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Extraordinary Writ, also said in his feedback It's up to you when you want to make the PERM request; the reviewing admin (who won't be me) will decide at that point whether you have enough experience. and you are all declining the request just because they said 'moving very quickly'? I came here to PERM because I was not answered when I questioned them on the Talk page and here again about the specific problem behind the decline. GrabUp - Talk 14:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
    @Hey man im josh, @Ingenuity: Why aren’t you responding? Please answer my question that brought me here. GrabUp - Talk 16:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Flemmish Nietzsche[edit]

I've been going through the new pages feed for a while now without the right, to clean up new pages and nominate for CSD those pages that fall under the criteria, (at least 50 by now, weird how the log is a red link) and I've also participated in AfD and other deletion venues as well. The reviewer right should help when going through the new pages feed as I have been doing to better help misguided editors and to more efficiently go through new articles, and of course reduce the almost 10000-tall backlog that still wasn't gotten rid of in the May backlog drive. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed — CLEAR!

Backlog CLEAN!

Extended confirmed 1,118

Extended confirmed[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Page mover 3,311

Page mover[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Zanahary[edit]

I've been editing seriously for one year, have 4,300+ edits, I've participated in RMs (including initiating them), and I've never had any behavioral blocks. Zanahary (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Kiran891[edit]

I've been an editor for 7+ years with 20K+ edits on Wikipedia, 78K+ edits on Wikidata, and over 8.5k edits on Wikimedia. In past month, I have tagged many files for move and figured I would rather ask for the filemover priviledges instead of duplicating work for other users. I've never been a disruptive editor. Please consider my request. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiran891 (talk • contribs) 2024-06-04T02:05:21 (UTC)

 Not done This is not the right page for requesting file mover flags, please reapply in the correct section. — xaosflux Talk 14:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't realize I was on wikipedia. Please feel free to remove this request. I'll ask on wikimedia site. Thanks. Kiran_891 (TALK) 19:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
@User:Kiran891 there is File namespace on English Wikipedia, but to request moving you'd need to ask at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/File mover. On other hand, for Wikimedia Commons see Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

User:AddWittyNameHere[edit]

Had the perm before, but it inactivity-lapsed a fair while ago and I held off on re-requesting upon my return because I had no need for it at the time. Would appreciate having it again so I can do WP:SWAP-style moves related to taxon articles (typically, either to bring articles in line with WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA and to fix taxon articles where the correct scientific name redirects to an invalid scientific name, but the redirect has post-creation edits.) AddWittyNameHere 20:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Template editor 4,937

Template editor[edit]

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Magentic Manifestations[edit]

Hi! I guess I would require this for doing certain edits with respect to certain templates, particularly with respect to Indian territories and transport. I have been making edits to templates within the ambit possible, but there are a couple of protected templates which would need additions (E.g. rint updation). So, it will be useful to have this. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Sohom Datta[edit]

I would like to request temporary template-editor userrights on en.wiki primarily to help out with converting templates to be dark mode compatible. :) Sohom (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

User:FarmerCars789[edit]

I want to have to be in the template editor group because i've already read the info page about Template editors, and also i've saw some mistakes and errors in templates that are restricted to the group i'm requesting. I want to fix them and maybe fix and edit templates locked behind the aforementioned group in the future if needed or for the better. FarmerCars789 (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 13 total edits and has 0 edits in the template and module namespaces. — MusikBot talk 18:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. You do not meet the minimum criteria for this permission. You can make edits to template-protected pages by making your edit on that template's sandbox subpage, then using {{TPER}} on the talk page to request that a template editor implement it. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit requests[edit]

Pending changes

Edit requests

23 semi-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
United States Senate (request) 2024-05-31 21:42 Semiprotected (log) Modified by El C on 2020-02-10: "Downgrade protection"
List of ethnic slurs (request) 2024-06-01 19:29 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-01-29: "Restoring semi-protection which was lost after the full prot - definitely still needed"
Sean Strickland (request) 2024-06-02 03:54 Semiprotected, expires 2024-11-01 at 03:54:34 UTC (log) Protected by Daniel Quinlan on 2023-11-01: "Violations of the biographies of living persons policy; requested at WP:RfPP"
Joe Wilkinson (request) 2024-06-02 10:21 Semiprotected, expires 2024-06-11 at 22:39:07 UTC (log) Protected by Daniel Quinlan on 2024-05-21: "Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content; requested at WP:RfPP"
List of Turkish football champions (request) 2024-06-02 13:32 Semiprotected, expires 2024-06-13 at 22:00:40 UTC (log) Protected by Daniel Case on 2024-05-23: "Persistent disruptive editing: per RFPP"
The Backrooms (request) 2024-06-02 17:00 Semiprotected (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2023-05-10: "Persistent vandalism"
January 23 (request) 2024-06-02 20:42 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Deb on 2021-01-22: "Persistent vandalism: repeated addition of doubtful content by anon and unconfirmed IPs"
New Jersey (request) 2024-06-02 22:06 Semiprotected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2015-05-12: "Persistent vandalism; restoring indefinite duration, few acceptable edits"
Economy of India (request) 2024-06-03 06:55 Semiprotected (log) Protected by The Blade of the Northern Lights on 2022-06-01: "Persistent disruptive editing; restoring previous semiprotection"
Justin Timberlake (request) 2024-06-04 00:09 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Ymblanter on 2016-05-10: "Persistent vandalism: well, we have to go back"
Sajeeb Wazed (request) 2024-06-04 12:25 Semiprotected (log) Protected by OhanaUnited on 2010-09-17: "pending changes trial ended"
The Real Housewives of Orange County (request) 2024-06-05 12:09 Semiprotected, expires 2024-07-20 at 02:01:08 UTC (log) Protected by Ad Orientem on 2022-07-20: "Persistent disruptive editing"
Shiv Sena (request) 2024-06-05 12:25 Semiprotected (log) Protected by El C on 2019-11-27: "Arbitration enforcement"
List of cities in Tamil Nadu by population (request) 2024-06-05 15:06 Semiprotected (log) Protected by Ymblanter on 2022-11-25: "Persistent disruptive editing: request at WP:RFPP"
2024 Indian general election in Andhra Pradesh (request) 2024-06-05 18:23 Semiprotected, expires 2025-02-20 at 18:24:57 UTC (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2024-02-20: "Persistent sockpuppetry"
Bill Maher (request) 2024-06-05 18:31 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Materialscientist on 2023-09-14: "Violations of the biographies of living persons policy"
Muhammad Ali (request) 2024-06-05 18:50 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Ad Orientem on 2017-01-23: "Persistent vandalism long term target for vandals"
Putinism (request) 2024-06-05 19:08 Semiprotected, expires 2024-11-03 at 00:51:07 UTC (log) Protected by Izno on 2023-11-03: "Persistent vandalism, longterm returning unhelpful editor on IP"
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Toxicv4lor (request) 2024-06-05 19:16 Not protected (log)
Reform UK (request) 2024-06-05 19:23 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Daniel Case on 2024-06-04: "Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content: per RFPP"
John Lennon (request) 2024-06-05 20:14 Semiprotected (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2011-03-23: "UNprotection isn't working at all"
Jeezy (request) 2024-06-05 21:02 Semiprotected (log) Modified by Anachronist on 2021-08-20: "Persistent disruptive editing: Almost 0% constructive edits from anon / unconfirmed users throughout the history of this article"
List of Coronation Street characters (request) 2024-06-05 21:27 Semiprotected, expires 2024-06-27 at 21:30:50 UTC (log) Protected by Ponyo on 2024-03-27: "Persistent sockpuppetry"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
17 extended-confirmed-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Greater Israel (request) 2024-05-30 12:51 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Protected by Ymblanter on 2019-02-15: "New editors are prohibited from editing this Arab–Israeli conflict related page: request at WP:RFPP"
Animal stereotypes of Palestinians in Israeli discourse (request) 2024-05-31 03:22 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Protected by Daniel Case on 2024-03-22: "Contentious topic restriction: per RFPP and ARBPIA"
Eurovision Song Contest 2024 (request) 2024-05-31 13:07 Extended-confirmed protected, expires 2024-08-21 at 14:33:30 UTC (log) Protected by El C on 2024-02-21: "Contentious topic restriction: WP:PIA, WP:ECR (related content)"
2024 Varzaqan helicopter crash (request) 2024-06-02 21:12 Extended-confirmed protected, expires 2024-06-19 at 21:15:21 UTC (log) Modified by Ymblanter on 2024-05-19: "Contentious topic restriction"
Yehuda Bauer (request) 2024-06-03 13:42 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Protected by TonyBallioni on 2020-06-01: "Arbitration Enforcement"
Template:Television in Turkey (request) 2024-06-03 14:51 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Protected by AmandaNP on 2020-05-10: "Massive sockpuppetry"
2024 United States presidential election (request) 2024-06-03 15:59 Extended-confirmed protected, expires 2025-01-31 at 23:59:00 UTC (log) Modified by El C on 2023-12-17: "Arbitration enforcement: upgrade to WP:ECP for the duration; WP:AP2"
Template:Israel–Hamas war (request) 2024-06-05 02:12 Extended-confirmed protected (log) From Template:2023 Israel–Hamas war: Protected by Galobtter on 2024-01-02: "Arbitration enforcement, WP:PIA"
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale (request) 2024-06-05 06:17 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Modified by El C on 2023-09-27: "Arbitration enforcement: upgrade to WP:ECP; WP:ARBIPA"
Death of Aner Shapira (request) 2024-06-05 06:38 Extended-confirmed protected (log) From Aner Shapira: Protected by Galobtter on 2024-01-02: "Arbitration enforcement, WP:PIA"
2024 Indian general election in Kerala (request) 2024-06-05 08:37 Extended-confirmed protected, expires 2025-04-09 at 23:52:00 UTC (log) Modified by El C on 2024-04-09: "Arbitration enforcement: upgrade to WP:ECP and extend duration; WP:ARBIND (2024 Indian general election articles request)"
Afar people (request) 2024-06-05 10:21 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2024-01-26: "Arbitration enforcement: Persistent socking. Enforcement of WP:HORN"
2024 Indian general election in Maharashtra (request) 2024-06-05 10:56 Extended-confirmed protected, expires 2025-04-09 at 23:51:52 UTC (log) Modified by El C on 2024-04-09: "Arbitration enforcement: upgrade to WP:ECP and extend duration; WP:ARBIND (2024 Indian general election articles request)"
Yom Kippur War (request) 2024-06-05 11:20 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2016-04-07: "WP:ARBPIA; using new extended confirmed protection level, previously enforced by Special:AbuseFilter/698"
Narendra Modi (request) 2024-06-05 16:52 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Modified by El C on 2021-04-13: "Arbitration enforcement: upgrade protection due to consistent disruption from confirmed accounts. Bio is a critical WP:ARBIPA page"
Israeli war crimes (request) 2024-06-05 17:54 Extended-confirmed protected (log) From Allegations of war crimes against Israel: Protected by Ingenuity on 2023-10-11: "Arbitration enforcement"
2024 Indian general election (request) 2024-06-05 19:05 Extended-confirmed protected (log) Modified by Daniel Quinlan on 2024-06-04: "Contentious topics enforcement for WP:CT/IPA; requested at WP:RfPP"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
0 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Noticeboards[edit]

Noticeboards
Interface administrators' noticeboard


Pennsylvania and weird message[edit]

Hey everyone, I'm not sure where to ask but this feels like the best place to do so. A work colleague has just brought up to my attention the page Pennsylvania, where if you are logged out, a big message saying "User:CheezDeez ON TOP" appears. That particular user has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppeting. I am unable to find anything like this in the source code and it only happens if you're logged out, so I presume this comes from some HTML/JS running somewhere and putting that there. It's the most bizarre thing I've ever seen on any Wikiproject and I'm not sure how to proceed, but I think you guys might have the best options on solving this. Thank you for taking a look and @ me if you need anything or if you solve this issue. I'm curious where it's coming from. KormiSK (talk) 18:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

This is cached template vandalism. See WP:VPT#Strange bug on Flag of Russia article. A null edit should sort it. Izno (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I've purged the page cache at that location, and I don't see any issues when viewing it. KormiSK, if you're still seeing that content, you likely need to clear your browser cache. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Stale request at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-watchlist-notice-core.js[edit]

Could an interface admin please handle the very old request at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-watchlist-notice-core.js? Thanks. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Using console.log instead of comments to blank user scripts[edit]

Example of a user script that a consensus at IANB caused to be blanked: User:Technical 13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver.js

Would it make more sense to console.log the blanking message rather than adding a comment? Would give the end user more of a hint as to what happened and what needs to be upgraded. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

I guess so, but given that anyone who knows enough to look at the javascript console will presumably know to also look at the script source to see what's going on, this feels like it'd be more trouble than it's worth. Since it's not really much of a use case, I think I'd personally prefer to keep using comments instead, for simplicity's sake. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Changing // to console.log seems fairly simple to me. Having a non-silent error seems better than a silent one to me. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
"Simple" from the perspective of not making an editor's browser do more than it needs to, even if it's just a logging statement. If it's not going to actually help anyone, why do it? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I see giving users a hint as to why their user script broke as superior to failing silently. No worries if you disagree though. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
If we had some extremely popular script, it could be part of the deprecation process, but agree with WK - the number of people that even know how to open their jslog is exceptionally low. — xaosflux Talk 18:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I agree with Novem Linquae - it will help some small subset of the population and hurt nobody so there's no reason not to do it. But this is a bridge best crossed when it happens, as Technical 13's script has been blanked long enough that everyone who needs to know has known already. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
What about mw.notify? Obviously it'd be fairly intrusive to have it on every page. — Qwerfjkltalk 20:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, def a no-go, and not worth doing shenanigans like 1/1k or 1/10k chance. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I think the point being made there is that for the overwhelming majority of users, checking the JS console in their browser is not the first port of call; a comment on the page itself is probably much more of a hint since most folks are far more likely/able to do do so. Putting a message in a console log is, for most, more akin to "failing silently" than a comment.
At any rate, clearly the answer is both. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I am almost always going to check the devtools js console before i go reading program code. But there's no support for my idea so i withdraw it. No worries. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm not going to stop someone adding console.log if they're the ones who are blanking a script, but I also don't want to be required to do so myself. Izno (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Template gadgets[edit]

Template gadgets - naming convention[edit]

Hi all, we've got the first request coming in to do a mw:Template gadgets. They are called that, but what these actually are is:

  • A javascript gadget
    • That is a default gadget
    • Normally hidden
    • That has a trigger such that it only runs when a page is in a certain category
      • The "templates" would likely implement that

We certainly need to be take due care in adding any such gadget definition, as basically any editor can cause other editors to run the gadget by placing a page in a category and getting someone else to visit the page. (Like all sitescripts, only intadmins can actually change the script). We already have a standard-ish process for having gadget requests made and processed. I think we should have a standard naming convention for these categories, perhaps Category:Wikipedia pages using gadget %NAME%. Any suggestions as to this? I think it should prob be a hidden category and we should have a master category for these as well (Category:Wikipedia gadget gategory triggers or something?). Feedback welcome below. — xaosflux Talk 11:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Context: MediaWiki:Gadget-Vivarium.js –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
All of what you proposed looks good to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I'd name the category Category:Pages using gadget %NAME%. There's only two categories using "Wikipedia pages using ...", and way more just "Pages using ...". --rchard2scout (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Makes sense. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Template gadgets - gadget settings[edit]

  • I've launched the first template gadget (Vivarium), it should be running at Template:Conway's Game of Life gadget. This is a "default gadget", but only runs on pages in the gadget category. The upstream suggestion is to make these hidden, but I'm not sure about that. Any harm in allowing logged in users to opt-out? — xaosflux Talk 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard (14 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (29 threads)
Administrative action review (0 threads)
Most recent:
Edit warring noticeboard (7 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread)
Bots noticeboard (2 threads)
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (7 threads)
Village pumps


Village Pump (policy) (12 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (14 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (5 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (23 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (7 threads)
Help


Help desk (42 threads)
Media copyright questions (8 threads)
Teahouse (59 threads)
Editorial


BLP noticeboard (19 threads)
Fringe theories noticeboard (17 threads)
Original research noticeboard (12 threads)
Reliable sources noticeboard (26 threads)
Neutral point of view noticeboard (20 threads)
External links noticeboard (4 threads)
Conflict of interest noticeboard (16 threads)
Dispute resolution noticeboard (1 thread)
Most recent:

News and Comment[edit]

The Signpost
16 May 2024
 
Administrators' Newsletter
June 2024
 
Arbitration Committee proceedings

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

[edit]
Open cases

Currently, no arbitration cases are open.

[edit]
Recently closed cases (Past cases)
Case name Closed
Venezuelan politics 25 May 2024
Request name Motions  Case Posted
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation none (orig. case) 13 May 2024
Clarification request: Extended confirmed restriction none none 29 May 2024
Clarification request: mentioning the name of off-wiki threads none none 4 June 2024

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

RfX candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Expires Report Notes
No nominations since 17:21, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Useful information[edit]

Adminstats for Amory

Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 55517
Edits+Deleted 65145
Pages deleted 27883
Revisions deleted 770
Logs/Events deleted 437
Pages restored 2186
Pages protected 867
Pages unprotected 130
Protections modified 318
Users blocked 2329
Users reblocked 70
Users unblocked 42
User rights modified 297
Users created 2
Abuse filters modified 6
Mass messages sent 18
Admin actions for Amorymeltzer
Type of action Percentage
Deletion/Undeletion 30069
  
 85.11%
Block/Reblock 2441
  
 6.91%
Protection/Unprotection 1315
  
 3.72%
RevDel 1207
  
 3.42%
User rights 297
  
 0.84%

Statistics are compiled from actions by Oversighters in the English Wikipedia suppression log.

  • One logged action (recorded below) may have resulted in more than one revision or log entry being suppressed.
  • One request for oversight may require multiple suppressions, revision-deletion instead of suppression, or no suppression at all.
  • Suppression by stewards, developers, or Wikimedia Foundation staff who are not appointed Wikipedia Oversighters are not included.
Oversighter Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
!a -9e99 -9e99
!a -9e99 -9e99
!a -9e99 -9e99
!a -9e99 -9e99
!a -9e99 -9e99
AmandaNP 3 6 2 0 1 0
Amorymeltzer 6 2 10 13 14 2
Anarchyte 0 0 7 10 0 3
Aoidh 0[1][2] 2 2 1 0 1
Barkeep49 26 16 5 10 26 5
Bradv 37 51 0 0 1 0
Cabayi 2 3 0 2 2 3
Callanecc 24 36 3 3 8 0
CaptainEek 0 0 0 0 0 0
Doug Weller 2 5 2 3 8 1
Dreamy Jazz 12 7 0 3 92 0[3]
Drmies 4 8 15 0 6 4
Dweller 3 1 2 2 10 12
Enterprisey 0[3][4]
Firefly 1[1][2] 9 0 16 4 0
GB fan 18 7 6 6 2 7
GeneralNotability 2 1 0 0 0[3][4]
GorillaWarfare 36 28 5 4 3 10
Guerillero 0 0 2 0 12 0
HJ Mitchell 151[2] 59 17 55 176 5
Izno 3[3][4]
KrakatoaKatie 0 8 4 7 9 11
Ks0stm 3 5 5 1 1 6
L235 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lofty abyss 4 9 3 3 4 2
LuK3 24 4 16 30 37 25
Mailer diablo 7 4 3 6 23 6
Maxim 0[1][2] 0 0 0 0 0
Moneytrees 3 0 4 0 1 7
Mz7 14 0 10 6 8 4
Oshwah 67 75 6 13 40 8
PhilKnight 208 110 56 61 81 35
Ponyo 7 12 14 4 14 9
Primefac 182 390 169 247 200 132
Richwales 4 3 4 3 4 0
Risker 0 1 0 0 0 0
Salvio giuliano 1 16 6 5 7 8
Sdrqaz 0[1][2] 339 174 121 273 62
SilkTork 0[3][4]
Stwalkerster 41 50 26 34 401 391
The Blade of the Northern Lights 4 2 7 7 7 0
Thryduulf 14 6 9 10 13 45
ToBeFree 0[1][2] 15 32 9 34 93
Vanamonde93 15 106 13 10 3 0
Wugapodes 1[4] 5 0 0 0 0
Xaosflux 7 8 16 12 9 23
Z1720 0[1][2] 0 0 0 0 0
Total 941 (-12.0%) 1,420 (+50.9%) 661 (-53.4%) 723 (+9.4%) 1,554 (+114.9%) 929 (-40.2%)
Legend
  Exempt from activity requirements, as a sitting community member of the Wikimedia Foundation Ombuds Commission.
  Current member of the Arbitration Committee (also exempt from activity requirements, for the duration of their term).
Notes
  1. ^ a b c d e f Joined oversight group
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Joined Arbitration Committee
  3. ^ a b c d e Left oversight group
  4. ^ a b c d e Left the Arbitration Committee
Administrator instructions
Wikipedia Administrators' guide
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/instructions
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Relisting straw poll
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators
Wikipedia:Deletion of unreferenced BLPs
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions
Template:DRV bottom
Template:DRV bottom/doc
Template:DRV top
Template:DRV top/doc
Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:History merging
Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Move review/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Guide to checking open proxies
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Proposed deletion
Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names/Administrators
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions/General
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Event coordinator/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/File mover/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Mass message sender/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Template editor/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Administrator instructions
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Administrators instructions
Wikipedia:Spam-blacklisting
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Closing instructions
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Instructions
User:Whiteguru/Tools
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Amorymeltzer/dash&oldid=941400642"