User:Alexxx1/The 10 Random Pages Test

I ripped off this idea from Ambi.

So here are my 10 random pages:

1. Nikolai Karlovich Medtner 8/10 - A 14-month old biographical article. Needs referencing - it's got nothing at the moment. The layout could be improved. Could do with another image or two. Otherwise, I would say it's getting close to feature article standard.
2. Beatrix Farrand 7/10 - Another biography. Not bad, but given that it has been kicking around for over 3 years, should probably be even better. The text is in one big block. Needs organising, needs an image, needs referencing.
3. CBHA-FM 5/10 - Just a stub that could use a little expanding. I've seen much worse.
4. Waraich 3/10 - Another stub. Needs a lot of work and is hard to understand at present.
5. Camp Couture 4/10 - Another stub. Not quite as confusing as the last one but not much information here.
6. St. Louisville, Ohio 6/10 - One of those US geography articles. Good statistical information and map links. Little else.
7. Plaza, North Dakota 6/10 - As above.
8. Treaty of Versailles 7/10 - This article has been around for ages. In some ways a good article. Good images. A good coverage of the material. But needs more referencing. Not very neutral POV in some places. Alternative viewpoints need expansion.
9. Ante-Fixae 4/10 Another stub.
10. Shichigahama, Miyagi 4/10 Another stub.

• 50% stubs
• 20% US geography articles
• 30% Reasonably good articles (although none of feature article standard)

Alexxx1 ^{(talk/contribs)} 05:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)