Template:Did you know nominations/Vildmarksvägen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 00:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Vildmarksvägen[edit]

Vildmarksvägen between Stekenjokk and Klimpfjäll

Created by Werldwayd (talk), GoingBatty (talk), λόγος (talk), BabbaQ (talk). Nominated by BabbaQ (talk) at 15:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC).

  • Comment adding "{{subst:DYKtick}} Good 2 go.--~~~~" is not a sufficient QPQ-review. Please review another article where you elaborate what you review and why it meets the DYK-criteria. The review you have used as a QPQ in this nomination have been questioned and continued by other editors - if not I would have asked you to go back and re-review that nomination. Mentoz86 (talk) 17:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
  • The article is not long enough. It currently runs at 1168 characters. It needs expansion to be considered further for DYK. Plus I cannot verify that ...sometimes also called the Stekenjokkvägen in reference [1]. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Done. And made a second hook, change it if needed.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I would suggest some more expansion because the length is just 1513 characters. As soon as someone copyedits the article it may easily fall below 1500. This is too close to the edge. Also the reference to ALT1 looks like a hotel website. Are you sure it is reliable? Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I will have to withdraw this nomination. It is difficult finding anymore information and I think the article is good on its own even if not mentioned at DYK. So withdrawn.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:32, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Perhaps you should reconsider. I have expanded it and included some nice new details. There was even a movie by Astrid Lindgren filmed in the area. That could be used as a hook. Not to mention that the population density of the wilderness area is less than 1 person per square km. Your choice. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 23:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
OK I searched and searched but did not find that information. So thank you!. Yes, lets go for that hook. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 10:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
You are very welcome BabbaQ. I agree. Let's go for ALT2. The problem now is that I cannot approve it because I created it. So we have to wait for some other editor to approve it. Take care. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 10:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
By the way the article after my expansion stands at 2662 characters. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 07:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Article is new enough, long enough, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen in English-language sources. QPQ done. ALT2 hook is catchy and verified. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)