Template:Did you know nominations/Smilax laurifolia
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Smilax laurifolia[edit]
- ... that the stems of blaspheme vine (pictured) are "viciously armed" with prickles?
- Reviewed: Eucalyptus botryoides
Created/expanded by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 10:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
The reference citing the claim that the vine is "viciously armed" with prickles doesn't explicitly mention this - it states "Its stems are armed with abundant to occasional, stout prickles". Could the article/hook perhaps be reworded to something like "armed with stout prickles"? Not quite as catchy but matches the source more closely. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. The wrong reference tag was there. It is a direct quote from the other reference.-IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Age, length and references all check out so I'm happy to pass this. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. The wrong reference tag was there. It is a direct quote from the other reference.-IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
