Template:Did you know nominations/S.A.S. v. France

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

S.A.S. v. France[edit]

(

)

... that in S.A.S. v. France the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a ban of face covering did not violate the European Convention on Human Rights?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sireköpinge Church

Created by Iselilja (talk). Self nominated at 23:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC).

Length and hook are ok, but no QPQ, and the creation date is March 12, not March 19. The expansion between those two dates was not five-fold, either. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

@Coemgenus: Would you care to rereview this? The article was created on the 12th, so technically just 7 hours late on the seven day deadline. It currently stands at around 2,100 characters, more than the 1,500 required for a new article. Fuebaey (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

@Fuebaey: Sure, that's close enough on the date. But what about the QPQ? --Coemgenus (talk) 23:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

True, pinging @Iselilja:. Fuebaey (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. Added a QPQ; sorry for missing it. Iselilja (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

That's everything then. Looks good to go. --Coemgenus (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)