Template:Did you know nominations/Rhapsody, Op. 1 (Bartók)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rhapsody, Op. 1 (Bartók)[edit]
- ... that the Rhapsody for piano was the first composition by Béla Bartók with an Opus number?
- Reviewed: Anita Brenner
Created by Wildbill hitchcock (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 17:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC).
The article is large and new enough, and neutrally written. But there are two uncited paragraphs in the sections. Please add appropriate references. On the topic of the hook, I do not see the hook in the text, and it is quite a non-statement, probably telling us nothing more than we see in the title "Op.1". So either find a more exciting hook, or include text in the article about why this is the first, and who gave it that opus number and when. Also the QPQ does not look to be done at all on the nomination claimed. Is this a mistake? Anyway enough DYK's have been earned that we want a QPQ review.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- What makes you think I didn't do the QPQ? - OPUS 1 is is a very important thing for some composers. - I will have time again after Easter, 7 April (we celebrate 2 days). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about that QPQ check, I was checking Wildbill hitchcock, but of course he did not nominate it. So QPQ was done! Perhaps the hook is not so lame, but I still think that it needs referencing more than the existence of the name. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe the fact that this was his first opus but not his first work would be a better hook, because he made up to three different opus lists during his lifetime. That is mentioned in the composer's main article, even though it is unreferenced. Wildbill hitchcock (talk) 00:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Béla Bartók composed his Rhapsody, Op. 1, in Lisztian style? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe not as catchy, but also quite good. Wildbill hitchcock (talk) 14:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hook alt1 is short enough, in the article, referenced and confirmed. But there is still an unreferenced paragraph at the end of the composition section. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe not as catchy, but also quite good. Wildbill hitchcock (talk) 14:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Béla Bartók composed his Rhapsody, Op. 1, in Lisztian style? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- I doubled the ref now, referencing no more that these works received certain numbers in a catalogue, - which possibly shouldn't be under "composition" but could go to the lead like other catalogue numbers, but I am only the nominator. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
now confirmed that all paragraphs are cited, combined with the above, it is now good to go with ALT1. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- I doubled the ref now, referencing no more that these works received certain numbers in a catalogue, - which possibly shouldn't be under "composition" but could go to the lead like other catalogue numbers, but I am only the nominator. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
