Template:Did you know nominations/David Whiting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

David Whiting

  • Reviewed: Ecem Güzel
  • Comment: long article, welcome to propose other hooks

Moved to mainspace by Kingsif (talk). Self-nominated at 05:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC).

  • Very interesting article and quite the star-studded life—and the worst case of oneitis I've ever heard. Poor Miles. Meets newness and length requirements easily, QPQ done. Earwig brings up the two most-cited sources as potential copyvios. To be expected, since they're cited almost 20 times each, and since the vast majority of the matches concern long quotes I'm willing to overlook it, but can we add more citations throughout the paragraphs? Particularly with "Conflict with Miles and Reynolds", there's four citations crammed at the end of the section. I think we should cite each after the corresponding sentences, especially where there's a direct quotation. Also for ALT0 we need a citation at the ends of the sentences for "Golden Boy" and "Whiz Kid". Otherwise nice read, and good use of sources. DigitalIceAge (talk) 20:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
  • @Narutolovehinata5 and DigitalIceAge: working on it now Kingsif (talk) 15:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Ok, I've directly addressed the recommendations, and added archive urls. I have also checked the copyvio report and am certain there is nothing of concern when comparing the texts. @DigitalIceAge: Is there anything else? Kingsif (talk) 16:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Looks good to me. I've added some more citations especially where concerns lengthy quotes and added a couple of line breaks within some really lengthy paragraphs. Very interesting and detailed article about a very obscure tragic Hollywood figure; at 5273 words it almost rivals Reynolds' biography. Nice work. DigitalIceAge (talk) 05:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
ALT0 to T:DYK/P1