Template:Did you know nominations/David Rabkin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 09:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

David Rabkin

Created by FlyingKangeroo (talk) and Bruxton (talk). Nominated by Bruxton (talk) at 02:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/David Rabkin; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Hi Bruxton (talk), was going to do a full review but a few things initially:
  •  Completed Uncited infobox says he was born in Cape Town but the cited main text only says South Africa.
  •  Completed Infobox also gives a date of death but the main text only says "November 1985"
  • What makes the MA thesis reliable? Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Scholarship says "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence".

Can you let me know on these before I continue with the review - Dumelow (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

@Dumelow: I made the necessary fixes. Thanks for catching these. Regarding the doctoral thesis I did not cite the thesis in the article, I only listed it in the external links section as an interest. It can be removed if you like. Bruxton (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bruxton, the doctoral thesis is fine. It's the MA thesis cited three times in the main text that I was referring to (Manenze, Jacob. "The Politicization of Funerals in South Africa During the 20th Century (1900-1994)". UPSpace. UPSpace. Retrieved 15 February 2023.). Does it meet the above requirement? - Dumelow (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
@Dumelow: the source is used to state that two people spoke at his funeral, and to name his two children and it states that he served 7 years of a ten year sentence. I am sure I could reference those to other sources: in my mind they are all uncontroversial. I will go about replacing them now. Bruxton (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 Completed using the Obituary in Sechaba, March 1986 to replace all three. Bruxton (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Bruxton, looks fine now. Article new enough, long enough, couldn't find any issues with copyright violation etc. However I struggled to verify the street renaming from the source given. It only states that the renaming was proposed (in 2011), I couldn't find any mention of the street name in a Google search (aside from this article from 2007 also discussing the proposed renaming) and it doesn't appear in a Google Maps search - Dumelow (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
@Dumelow: Thanks for the research about the street. I removed the bit about the street from the article and wrote two new hooks. See if you like them.
Bruxton (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bruxton, looks fine to me. I slightly amended the hook and article from "distributed" to "published" as the latter was the wording used by the force and they aren't quite synonymous - Dumelow (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)