Talk:Zwentendorf Nuclear Power Plant

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Factual issues[edit]

Having being a native german speaker and having stumbled across the english version of this article, I could not help but notice that there are numerous issues in this article. Most numbers (number of plants in austria, cost, currency, ...) are simply wrong, and appear correct in the cited sources and in the german wiki article. In the first edit I just made, I corrected some of the horrible denglish used in the text, the next edit will replace numbers I personally cross checked with the german-language sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.208.100.196 (talk) 17:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question about picture[edit]

Picture shows a large smokestack. Nuclear power doesn't need a smokestack because no combustion. So the question is, why is there that smokestack? Is it used for water vapor? Or is this a picture of a coal plant? TeH nOmInAtOr (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a smokestack, it's for venting steam. DS (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steam, radioactive gasses and other radionuclides. If it were steam alone the stack wouldn't need to be so tall, but 'the solution to pollution being dilution', the tall stack helps to minimize the dose to workers and those living nearby. Nonukes (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the solar panels[edit]

The article states: "After completion, 1000 solar panels on the face of the building and on the lot will provide approximately 180 MWh of electricity per year".

Note that's not MW, nor MWh, it's MWh/yr (which is confusing). 180MWh/yr is actually 20.55KW or 27.56hp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.92.59.194 (talk) 17:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zwentendorf Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]