Talk:You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright violation[edit]

The synopsis section was borrowed from http://www.musicalnotesnmore.com/main-V-Z.html. This type of contribution is against Wikipedia policies and therefore, it was reverted. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 05:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snoopy vs. the Red Baron?[edit]

My school choir performed selections from You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown when I was in high school, and I distinctly remember a number where militaristic music is played as Snoopy recites a monologue about being a World War I flying ace and engaging the Red Baron in aerial combat. (I dare say I remember that accurately--I played Snoopy!) The sheet music and lyrics for "Snoopy vs. the Red Baron" came from the same book as the rest of the selections we performed, and all of the others are listed in this article (the title song, "Schroeder", "Glee Club Rehearsal", and "Happiness"). So where is "Snoopy vs. the Red Baron"? - Pennyforth 06:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number of differences between the later version and the original. I'm not sure that they are all bad, but as a former Charlie Brown, all I can say is . . .*sigh* . . .I'm going to go drown my sorrows in a haircut. 68.178.65.194 01:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happiness is a worn poppy[edit]

The title song was parodied by the Dukes of Stratosphear on the album Psonic Psunspot as "You're A Good Man Albert Brown (Curse You Red Barrel)". The song recounts the latter days of a World War I soldier; not so much a flying ace as a shell-shocked survivor. Asat 01:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very little about the revival[edit]

We need to find published sources to use to flesh out the section about the revival. The Sally Brown part was created for Kristin Chenoweth specifically, which is a notable element. Lawikitejana 14:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original version[edit]

Considering the impact the original stage production had and the fact that for three decades it was the one performed in stock, school productions, and community theater, shouldn't it take precedence over the revival in the article? Simply describing the characters, songs, and synopsis of the revival without doing the same for the original version is a bit akin to George Lucas insisting Greedo was always meant to have shot first...ChrisStansfield 01:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree that the original production of the show should probably be given a bit more attention than it currently receives in this article. However, I'm sure that many editors (myself included) are much more familiar with more recent productions of the show, which is probably why that seems to be the focus of this article (most of my personal knowledge of the show comes from this article and the soundtrack to the 1999 Broadway revival). Still, I don't think that the differences between the productions are too terribly great, so I doubt the article needs a total rewrite or anything, maybe just some additional information in certain sections. If you're familiar with the original production, or can find some sources providing further information about the differences between the productions, feel free to add to the article. —Mears man (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a good reference for the differences between the original and revised productions from Tams-Witmark: [1]. I don't have the time to do any work on this article. (Just a quick reading of the comments by Clark Gesner in the Tams-Witmark article seems to show that there was quite a bit that was changed: "All the music and dialogue for the show has been reworked; it is not just the same thing with two new songs. All the show's incidental music, dance music, vocal arrangements and orchestrations are brand new..." And of course there is the new character of Kristin-oops-Sally. JeanColumbia (talk) 20:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the original version, I see "Peanuts Potpourri" listed among the music titles, and I wonder if I remember hearing an excerpt from its music. What became of that music in the revised version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.52.3 (talk) 21:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal range[edit]

Does anyone have a source for the vocal ranges of the various characters in this musical? I stumbled upon a bit of a debate on YouTube as to what the desired vocal range for the character of Snoopy was. Some were saying that Snoopy was supposed to be a baritone, citing Wikipedia as their source, while others insisted that Snoopy was supposed to be a tenor and that Wikipedia was wrong on the matter. I checked the article and saw that no sources were cited, so I tagged them as needing references. Can anyone help to clear up this matter? —Mears man (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that Snoopy is supposed to be a tenor. Hmm. I have a copy of the score at home and I'll take a look at it when I can; I'm at work now. AJD (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here we are. The ranges are given as follows. Sally: B below middle C to second A-flat above middle C. Lucy: G below middle C to second F above middle C. Snoopy: C below middle C to A above middle C. Schroeder: second B-flat below middle C to A-flat above middle C. Charlie Brown: second B-flat below middle C to F above middle C. Linus: second B-flat below middle C to E above middle C. By ordinary understandings of vocal ranges, this makes Sally a soprano, Lucy a mezzo-soprano, Snoopy and Schroeder tenors, and Charlie Brown and Linus baritones. I'll correct the article. AJD (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Gordon[edit]

I was trying to disambiguate this page, but I am not sure what to do with John Gordon. I do not beleive that he already has an article, but there has to be a way to refer to him without using the disambig. page. I was thinking about adding something (like this) afterwards, but I don't know what I should put there exactly.--Mynameisnotpj (talk) 03:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clark Gesner[edit]

I'm wiki limited, so I just roughly added a "Clark Gesner" section to the article. He wrote the lyrics and music for the whole original production, so, certainly he deserves significant meniton in the YAGMCB article--not to mention a separate entry in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.106.215 (talk) 13:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., my entry keeps getting zapped, so here's the raw material I was using, which maybe someone can use as the seeds for a Clark Gesner article.

Composer, songwriter and author, educated at Princeton University (Bachelor of Arts). He wrote three Triangle shows, and songs for the Julius Monk revues "Baker's Dozen" and "Bits and Pieces". Joining ASCAP in 1962, his popular-song compositions included "14 Hours and 37 Minutes", "A Funny Way to Spend the Day", "The Peanut Butter Affair", "Societus Magnificat" and "Ode to a Park" (New York Park Association)--IMDB


By Margaret Johnson, Published: Thursday, October 12th, 2000, Daily Princetonian

"It sounds like you've got the same thing I've got," he tells me after we both survive a brief coughing spell. "Bronchitis. I had a doctor's appointment today." The voice is gentle and low, with a certain humility. On a late Saturday afternoon, my conversation with Clark Gesner '60 meanders from our health concerns to his memories of Princeton and on to our mutual appreciation of Betty Boop, and I almost forget that I am speaking to a guru of American musical theater. This is, after all, the man who taught Charlie Brown to sing.

Gesner's "You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown" opened at the Off-Broadway Theatre at 80 St. Mark's on March 7, 1967 and has since become one of the most frequently staged musicals in America. What some might consider surprising about the show's phenomenal success is that its author never intended for it to exist.

"It was very much a personal exploration," Gesner said. "I just liked the strip. I never wanted to make a show out of it."

But for Gesner, the songs kept coming.

"It just proceeded," he recalled. "Finally I sent a demo to [Charles] Schultz, and he just liked it very much and called me back and told me so, and so from then on [I] sort of had permission."

"I was reluctant all the way through," he added, "but finally I buckled down and saw how it could be done, and I wrote songs and scenes and sort of laid it out, and it opened, and it's been supporting me for the rest of my life."

I can tell that Gesner is grateful and rather astounded by his success — genuinely amazed that a private pet project has brought him all that "Charlie Brown" has, especially since he says he did not originally see musical theater as a career.

It was, however, musical theater that drew him to the University — specifically, the Triangle Club. With a grandfather from the Class of 1890, he had a connection to the University, but Triangle reeled him in.

"I lived in Plainfield, New Jersey at the time," Gesner said. "The Triangle show came there twice and I saw both of them and I would say that decided me." He worked with Triangle all four years as an undergraduate, playing and writing music, acting and, eventually, his senior year, conducting. "Even then they got me on the stage because in the last number they came down and lifted me out of the pit and put me in a little gold piano on stage and I played," he remembered.

I ask him if he was ever a member of a Triangle kick line, and he replies eagerly, "I was! Even on television. Ed Sullivan. We were in flapper dresses. The name of the number was the 'Skulk Step.' It was a Charleston. We all had cloche hats. It was very nice."

I laugh, picturing Princeton men in flapper drag on national television, and Gesner seems pleased. He tells me about going on a European tour with Triangle after graduation, before going to New York in a Volkswagon "literally to seek my fortune."

That fortune for the next few years involved holding cue cards and eventually writing for the television show "Captain Kangaroo," serving during Vietnam on Governor's Island off the tip of Manhattan and helping get "Sesame Street" off the ground.

And then came "Charlie Brown" and its four-year, 1,597-performance run.

I decide now is a good time to whip out my most controversial question: "Who is your favorite 'Peanuts' character?"

"Oh dear." He pauses. "I guess it's Linus. Linus I do identify a little bit more with."

Then we talk about his career since the smash comic-inspired hit, including writing the scores for "The Utter Glory of Morissey Hall" on Broadway, "Animal Fair" — which he proudly calls "really my own" — and a still-to-be-produced musical about Betty Boop. Gesner has also acted in summerstock theater in Vermont for the last dozen years.

"The main thing is that 'Charlie Brown' has allowed me to really pick and choose," he said. "I never was that ambitious. All I have is little ideas — they're like seeds and each one requires its own kind of caring."

His voice is gentle, and his words are wise and warm for a chilly Saturday. Reluctant to let the conversation end, I ask if he's coming back to Princeton any time soon. I find myself delighted when he confides that he's considering performing in a show here in a few months. "I'm still undecided. You can say I'm contemplating. I would love to be back on the McCarter stage after 40 years." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.106.215 (talk) 13:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Song list[edit]

This note appears at the end of the current article's song section: "Note: "Queen Lucy" and "Peanuts Potpourri", which were featured numbers in act two in the original productions, were cut from the revival." Shouldn't the list show the songs of the original production with a note referencing which songs were cut or added for the revival, rather than the reverse? --Thomprod (talk) 19:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The iTunes listing of the original off-Broadway recording should have all the songs used int he original, so I suggest splitting this into two song lists. --Bialytock&Bloom (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recordings?[edit]

I remember having a record (I think) of "You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown" recording that had as a cast member Kaye Ballard as Lucy. Does anyone know more about this? Thanks!Jtyroler (talk) 07:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I had (probably still do) the same record you're talking about; I too remember Kaye Ballard as Lucy. But this is just a Peanuts recording based on some of the strips (like much of the musical). It's not in any way related to the musical show. (Except of course for "Peanuts".) JustinTime55 (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Book Report on Peter Rabbit"[edit]

Unless the revival made some significant changes, it should be Charlie Brown comparing the book to Robin Hood, Schroeder doing the critical analysis and Linus procrastinating, same as in the original production. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrFraud (talk • contribs) 13:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, NO! That is totally out of character. Charlie Brown is the procrastinator, Shroeder is the romantic and so sang the Robin Hood comparison, and Linus is the intellectual / preacher, so he did the psychological analysis.
Sometimes changes might be made for certain reasons: my son appeared in a local production of YAGMCB; he was Shroeder's understudy. He's strictly an amateur actor and singer (though not bad), and the production was put on by a local troupe of somewhat more seasoned actors. He was lucky to get to perform because of a domino effect: the prime Shroeder was also Linus's understudy, and Linus was the one who got sick. Since Schroeder's verse is a patter song requiring a bit more talent than my son possessed, the director switched the songs and had Linus sing the Robin Hood part (which he already learned as Schroeder) while my son, as Shroeder, did Linus's part (which is actually recited rather than sung), hoping nobody in the audience would notice. But I sure did! JustinTime55 (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:You%27re_a_Good_Man,_Charlie_Brown&oldid=1204432675"