A fact from Yinka Jegede-Ekpe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Yinka Jegede-Ekpe, the first Nigerian woman to go public with her HIV-positive status, later gave birth to a healthy, HIV-negative baby girl?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to AIDS, HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Yes many HIV-negative babies are born to HIV-positive women, but the proposed hookiness here is that Yinka Jegede-Ekpe was the first woman in Nigeria to publicly announce her HIV-positive status and then experienced a lot of discrimination (head of medical school told her to stop studying, school locked her out of bathroom, choir didn't want to sing with her any more etc), so then her giving birth to a HIV-negative baby is the hopefully happy ending to a tough story. I've edited the page a bit to reflect this and made a new hook (ALT2) hope it helps. Or ALT3 is another suggestion.Mujinga (talk) 21:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would also disagree that the original hooks were uninteresting. I'm not sure that the general public would be aware that that can occur. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explaining this, Mujinga! I was previously unaware of most of this; the situation is quite interesting. I like ALT3 and maybe ALT4 as they convey this situation most directly. —Shrinkydinks (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Second opinion requested as to whether the provided hooks (including the two new ones) are interesting, and in the case of ALT2 and ALT3, are cited. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I think the original hook is interesting. The alt-hook variations have problems, in my opinion. The fact that she was the first to go public about her HIV status is interesting, and not everyone knows that giving birth to an HIV-negative child is not so unusual, and it shows hope in a situation that initially appears very bleak. In ALT1, the "in 2006" seems like an unnecessary distraction – readers can go read the article to learn about exactly when she gave birth, and the reader still doesn't know when it was that she went public (which is more interesting to the reader than when she gave birth). ALT2 uses "but" improperly – for disconnected issues: it is possible to give birth while being shunned, and giving birth does not stop shunning. Shunning remains harmful even if one has a healthy child. ALT3 seems to shift the focus from her to UNICEF. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hooks are not sufficiently interesting; many babies born to HIV positive mothers are not positive.
buidhe 21:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Second opinion requested as to whether the provided hooks (including the two new ones) are interesting, and in the case of ALT2 and ALT3, are cited. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Personally, I think the original hook is interesting. The alt-hook variations have problems, in my opinion. The fact that she was the first to go public about her HIV status is interesting, and not everyone knows that giving birth to an HIV-negative child is not so unusual, and it shows hope in a situation that initially appears very bleak. In ALT1, the "in 2006" seems like an unnecessary distraction – readers can go read the article to learn about exactly when she gave birth, and the reader still doesn't know when it was that she went public (which is more interesting to the reader than when she gave birth). ALT2 uses "but" improperly – for disconnected issues: it is possible to give birth while being shunned, and giving birth does not stop shunning. Shunning remains harmful even if one has a healthy child. ALT3 seems to shift the focus from her to UNICEF. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
