Talk:X-Men: Phoenix – Warsong

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Untitled[edit]

Are they clones, or are they emma's daughters?

i think they're emma's daughters since they were formed using emma's eggs.

That's right, using an egg (or sperm) cell won't give you a clone because it contains only half of a person's DNA. -- Noneofyourbusiness 22:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the answer could be both yes and no:

they have to be Emma's offspring (not her clones) due to the aforementioned reason above; but they could quite possibly be clones of each other. Whether all of them are clones is another issue up for debate: if Subline stone thousands of ova, he could've created thousands of different phenotypical offspring and only cloned some of them to be duplicate copies (i.e. the 5n1). Cloning every single one of them may not have been an efficient idea, as a single offshoot might not have inherited the specific/strongest aspects of Emma's psionic potential. Ergo, some of the offspring may be clones of each other, but some may be as different as any other set of non-identical sisters would be; the comic simple hasn't yet specified.

Third?[edit]

Where was it stated that there would be a third story? Just curious. Did the writer or Joe Quesada or an editor actually reveal this, or is it just speculation that the Phoenix minis will be a trilogy?

Fair use rationale for Image:Warsong1.jpg[edit]

Image:Warsong1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]