Talk:World Serpent Distribution

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Industrial Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndustrialWikipedia:WikiProject IndustrialTemplate:WikiProject IndustrialIndustrial music articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Industrial To-do:

Top priority articles to improve to Good article status

Front 242
Front Line Assembly
Ministry
Skinny Puppy
Throbbing Gristle – needs "Musical style" and "Critical reception" sections
Wax Trax! Records

High priority articles to improve to B-Class status

Mid priority articles to improve to C-Class status

Leavers[edit]

The article says that Rice, Pearce and Julius left the label, implying they did it of their own free will. But it is at least equally possible that they were asked to leave due to perceived incompatibility, including in political matters. Finding a source for that is not going to be easy, though. --Richardrj ^talk ^email 09:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Making this page better[edit]

I agree that World Serpent is notable but the page as it stands lacks credible referencing. This material is laughably POV:

"It is testament to the legacy that World Serpent left behind, that they still provoke reaction, with people still debating about them, nearly a decade after they ceased to be. They pushed boundaries, broke new ground, and flew in the face of the music industry[. World Serpent Distribution has been much copied and imitated, but never bettered or equaled. The legacy they left behind speaks for itself."

The material about the end is hilariously unencyclopedic too: "Misinformation and rumours of bankruptcy,liquidation, a court case that never was,had begun to circulate from certain quarters. Those in the know,knew this not to be the case.Neither the 3 directors,nor World Serpent itself, was ever the subject of a bankruptcy,liquidation, or an administration hearing. Nor did they ever lose a court case."

There should be a fair amount of referencable material online and David Keenan's book "Englands Hidden Reverse" also. John Eden (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Content Removal and References[edit]

It's been a long while since World Serpent shut its doors and it's been a long while since I've edited this article. Back when World Serpent abruptly shut down, it seemed to be pretty widely reported among associated artists that the company owed at least a handful of them money. As I recall, there were various other complaints as well. I see that the brainwashed.org complaint still stands about outstanding debt, for example. This all apparently used to be referenced. Admittedly, Wikipedia referencing policy used to be far more loose than it is nowadays, and so these references need to be relocated, probably with an archive service like the Wayback Machine, checked and reinstated. Meanwhile, it seems that there are a few users who regularly come by and attempt to clear any mention of controversy from the article. One can only guess who they are, but that's not my business. Still, if we're going to have a section on it, it's going to need to be solidly referenced. :bloodofox: (talk) 03:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]