Talk:Webroot/Archives/2012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notable
Ok, allow me to elaborate here. Webroot is a well known company that does meet the guidelines of WP:CORP. Here are examples of all points of that guideline. 1.)"# The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself." Webroot has created 5 software titles, Spy Sweeper, Window Washer, Spam Shredder, Desktop Firewall and Child Safe, as well as won 20+ awards from PC Magazine. This product line is also sold in many stores including Best Buy, Software Etc, and is sponsored by Geek Squad. The notability of this company meets the guidelines of Wikipedia, so i'm lost as to how you believe its not. Mgarnes2 16:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Spam Shredder
As of april 30 2007 I can't find anything at all about spam shredder on the webroot website. I guess it was discontinued, so I removed it from the article--JCGracik talk c 20:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Instead of removing it, you should just have put it in the past tense. Wikipedia talks about the past, obviously: that is history.58.6.131.227 (talk) 00:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Possible conflict of interest
I note that User:Limabo88 has made edits only to pages related to Webroot software, creating the pages Webroot Window Washer, Webroot Internet Security Essentials, and Webroot AntiVirus with AntiSpyware. This may be a coincidence, or the editor may be a non-biased fan of Webroot. It is also possible, though, that the user may have a conflict of interest. Cnilep (talk) 21:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Removed the outdated flags from August 2009 noting that this page is missing citations as numerous citations have been added to page to validate the content. COE tag has also been removed as it has been substantially been edited since preciously flagged.Rohija (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Rohija
adv & cleanup templates
I am removing those templates since I do not see anything particular warranting either cleanup or tagging the article style as advertisement. -- BaldPark (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)