Talk:Webconverger

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Close connection[edit]

Yes, since I'm a Wikipedia user, I didn't like to see Webconverger article get out of date with the current release version. I've refrained from making substantial edits to the text and I've made no attempt to hide myself which seems commonplace on other articles. I've declared I work for Webconverger on my user page. Hendry (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think in this case it doesn't matter if the author hides himself or not. You seem to be the main contributor to this article since the last two years and kept the article alive. If there is little interest from others in editing the article it should be questioned if the topic is relevant enough to have it's own article. Anyway the indepence of an author who is working for the article's subject should always questioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BroncoPfefferminz (talk • contribs) 08:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you spend some time improving the article instead of trying to get it deleted BroncoPfefferminz? Thousands of people everyday get online thanks to Webconverger. Hendry (talk) 07:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

IT media have covered Webconverger several times and there is non-exhaustive list here: http://webconverger.org/press Hendry (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMO most of these mentions don't support notability. They lack independence and seem to me like a collection of promotional or advertising material which isn't a bad thing if used on the product's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BroncoPfefferminz (talk • contribs) 08:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, how do they lack independence? Webconverger did NOT pay for these reports. Hendry (talk) 08:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any Linux Kiosk software that is more popular than Webconverger.. GQuigs (talk) 04:15, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate if a third party then would remove the notability flag and improve the article --Hendry (talk) 02:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found a couple of articles I will add, which I think show enough notability to remove the tag. Francis Bond (talk) 01:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License?[edit]

The article states it is released under the MIT license. On the other hand it says it's built on top of the Debian distro, which is mainly licensed under the GPL. Confusing. 85.131.23.217 (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The build script and contributions by Webconverger as a company are licensed under MIT. Hendry (talk) 04:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webconverger.png Nominated for Deletion[edit]

	An image used in this article, File:Webconverger.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New logo[edit]

Hi there, there is a new logo here: https://webconverger.com/images/logo.svg

Could that please be put in the article? Thank you Hendry (talk) 07:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]