Talk:We on Fire

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We on Fire → We On Fire – It says the new title everywhere in the page except for the title, so it must be the official name of the song. Ian Streeter (talk) 13:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ Oppose Amazon gives the name in the proposed form, but WorldCat says "We on Fire". Kauffner (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But WorldCat spells everything wrong. They didn't even spell 'Big Tymers' correctly! Ian Streeter (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:ALBUMCAPS (and, yes, I know this is not an album, but that guideline covers singles as well). Wikipedia has a house style and I see no reason why we shouldn't follow it here. Jenks24 (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But just look at the single cover! It writes it as "We On Fire"! Ian Streeter (talk) 12:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:ALBUMCAPS - I don't necessarily agree with with that guideline, but we have to stick to something consistent -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have anything against styling song titles, but this seems more like careless copy editing. Kauffner (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.