Talk:Water Eaton, Milton Keynes

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

Water Eaton → Water Eaton, Milton Keynes – Someone recently turned this page into a disambig page pointing to the two Water Eatons that were mentioned in the article, however a brief glance at the page history shows that most of the history relates to the Milton Keynes village and that a brief half-sentence about the other one was only added five edits ago. The page should have been moved and the redirect turned into a disambig. -- Roleplayer 02:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Comment It would be good to fix the cut&paste move; but I otherwise support this being a disambiguation page (which would mean I oppose the RM) -- Ratarsed 13:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not doubting the validity of this being a disambig page and suggest that it should be so in my reason for suggesting the move above. I'm requesting the move to fix the cut and paste move because the article at Water Eaton, Milton Keynes now looks like it was created entirely by just one user. -- Roleplayer 23:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like I misunderstood your reason for move, as did Vegaswikian -- I see the c&p move has been fixed now, as I was (trying to) suggest -- Ratarsed 08:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Two places with articles, this should be a dab. If the articles are two stubby, then they can be converted to a redirect, but the dab would still serve a purpose. Vegaswikian 16:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See my response above. I think you've got the wrong end of the stick. -- Roleplayer 23:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So if I deleted Water Eaton, Milton Keynes, reverted Water Eaton to pre dab and then moved Water Eaton to Water Eaton, Milton Keynes we would be OK? That should restore the edit history. The dab could then be created again. Vegaswikian 23:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes that would work. -- Roleplayer 00:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, done. Water Eaton, Milton Keynes will need some stub cleanup. Vegaswikian 01:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- Roleplayer 11:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Denbigh, Buckinghamshire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 23:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]