Talk:Warlock: The Armageddon

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Status as a sequel[edit]

How is it "unconnected" and a "sequel" both? thanks - Her Pegship 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a sequel in the sense that it shares the same themes and title character, but it is unconnected with the first movie, and doesn't allude to it at all. No characters return aside from the Warlock himself, and he has a completely different agenda. Hope that clears things up. Levid37 01:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Warlock in this film is possibly a differant warlock as he has a differant origin story and is depicted as a supernatural being whereas the warlock in the original was still human they just both happen to look like Julian Sands they may not even take place in the same movie universe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sausage the monkey (talk • contribs) 08:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Druids[edit]

I see no reason to include the Druids as being unrelated. I know they aren't. But who cares? Its a movie.—Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEpicLevelHandbook (talk • contribs)

Yeah, it's a bit silly especially for such an obvious fantasy movie.--Sus scrofa 12:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From what I remember of the movie, I don't even think it's correct. I recall the distinction between druids and christians being a central plot point in the film, and I'm pretty sure it never said that the druids worshiped "God". 203.94.171.34 (talk) 03:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC) iiago[reply]

Improving this article...[edit]

Redlinks are not death. They encourage new articles. For instance, an article on Peter Abrams might be created through a bit of work. [1]. Let's encourage new artilces. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]