Talk:WLTP (AM)

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Stub class[edit]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Ohio stub]] on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Project Ohio|class=stub|importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SkiersBot (talk • contribs) 16:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:33, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 November 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved, with disambiguation page created at the base title. (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 11:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WLTP → WLTP (AM) – To point WLTP to worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure as WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT over the radio station, given page views [1] and usage in WP:RS [2][3]. A disambiguation page at WLTP is also fine by me, if editors create pages referring to other significant usages of this acronym during the course of this move discussion. Regarding the proposed disambiguator, see WP:NCBC#North America ("For stations which do not have a suffix, if disambiguation is necessary (because the official call sign conflicts with an airport code or acronym), place the type of service in parentheses"). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. SITH (talk) 12:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: The worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure would be WHLVTP, not WLTP. Sorry. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:23 on November 8, 2018 (UTC)

Nope. As the article and the tens of thousands of Google News hits indicate, they use the acronym WLTP. No one uses WHLVTP. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I still stand by my opposition...BUT, I am willing to admit when I'm wrong and compromise. Create WLTP as a disambig page. Move WLTP Radio to the aforementioned WLTP (AM) and there would be a link to the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure page. I can do this now, if you agree. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:16 on November 9, 2018 (UTC)

Support moving this page, but I agree with Neutralhomer that the undabbed WLTP should be a dab page rather than a straight redirect to the emissions standard. Bearcat (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Didn't research so no input on the other WLTP, but the station proposal is not in-line with WP:NCBC#Stations. It should be WLTP (radio station). --Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Actually, it is within WP:NCBC#Stations. You need to read it a little better. We only go by FCC callsigns and MOS, which says, if it's WXXX-FM, WXXX-FM is what the page is called. If it's WXXX-AM (which the FCC doesn't use the "-AM" in their callsigns) and there isn't a page that will cause problems (like the worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure page), it's WXXX. If there is or the station is part of an AM/FM combo with the same callsign (see WINC-FM/WINC (AM) for example), it would be WXXX (AM). The "(AM)" shows the station is an AM station, and within FCC callsign guidelines, it would show that WXXX is the station's callsign, the AM is afterthought, but correct per FCC, as again, they do not mention "-AM" in their callsigns even on air. In this case, WLTP would be moved to the correct WLTP (AM), not to WLTP (radio station), per MOS. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:18 on November 11, 2018 (UTC)
Gonnym, I think you missed the part of WP:NCBC#stations where it specifies "except for North America as outlined below." Bearcat (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving this article to WLTP (AM) and creating a disambiguation page at WLTP. Obviously, a radio station in Marietta, Ohio isn't really the primary topic when the other meaning for "WLTP" is a worldwide emissions standard… but that doesn't necessarily mean that the standard is itself the primary topic (and dab pages can list as few as two articles in the absence of a true primary topic). --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support no primarytopic Dicklyon (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.