This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starchild Abraham Cherrix and kept with name change, but in a half-done messed up job, there is no mention of any legal case corresponding to the article name in the article. Gene Nygaard 16:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The legal case took place in 2006. Rose M Cherrix (talk) 21:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per the article linked above, he got so much radiation therapy targeting certain parts of his body he cannot get anymore. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He did not have so much radiation that he could not get anymore. What he had at a cancer center was low dose target radiation directly at the tumors. No other part of his body received radiation except the tumors. Plus he never had high dose radiation. He did have a stem cell transplant many years ago though due to his immune system not being able to get better due to his chemo when he was 15. He is now 33 and been cancer free for many many years Rose M Cherrix (talk) 21:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the name of the altmed-ish oncologist from this article because it seems spammy to include the name of a non-notable person (why would you do that, unless you're hoping to drive customers to him?), and because he's not likely to be practicing medicine any longer.[1][2][3]WhatamIdoing (talk) 14:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
