Talk:Vietnamese morphology

Vietnamese monosyllabic or not?

"Vietnamese is often erroneously considered to be a "monosyllabic" language." I have issues with this statement, not the least of which is that this statement has no references.

I do not know of any Vietnamese "morpheme" that cannot stand alone i.e. every Vietnamese word consists of a single morpheme, which morpheme always can stand alone. Since there are no Vietnamese morphemes that can not stand alone, every Vietnamese morpheme is a word, and therefore Vietnamese is a monosyllabic language.

Supply a reference to support the "Vietnamese is not a monosyllabic language" claim, or name at least one Vietnamese morpheme that cannot stand alone, else "Vietnamese is not a monosyllabic language" is wrong and needs to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aqn (talk • contribs) 04:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

The answers are in the article actually. Along with the references in the bibliography. – ishwar  (speak) 05:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Vietnamese morphology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/66/c0.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071215102439/http://vietnamese-grammar.group.shef.ac.uk:80/index.php to http://vietnamese-grammar.group.shef.ac.uk/index.php
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080531005511/http://listserv.linguistlist.org:80/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9303B&L=linguist&P=R1166&D=0 to http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9303B&L=linguist&P=R1166&D=0
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080531223912/http://listserv.linguistlist.org:80/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9303b&L=linguist&P=2167 to http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9303b&L=linguist&P=2167

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)