Talk:Viejos amigos
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Notability[edit]
WP:GNG requires multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources that constitute towards significant coverage. Ref 1, a YouTube video, is a reliable source, ref 4 does not seem to meet reliable sources guidelines at WP:RS, with an about us but no editorial policies indicating a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
. Further, ref 5 shows it winning a minor audience award, whereas ref 6 is a trivial mention, both failing the significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) requirements. However, ref 3 is a full review that is probably reliable, and ref 2, while being mainly quotes and debatably SIGCOV to me goes into decent detail. Therefore to me whether it meets GNG is borderline. Alternatively, I don't believe that this meets any additional criteria of WP:NFILM, can you find more references, Phantom Oficiall? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC)