This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Victor Bruns appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
From this guideline, dated 2010: "is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article". I am one of the editors of this article, actually the one who added most of the refs, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have no objections to you adding an infobox, but I'm not sure how they really help in bio articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it would, in this case. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You got it ....to quote your link "I ask Nikkimaria to follow my edits to improve English and formatting, but please not revert an infobox without prior discussion". What happened was the exact opposite of what should have taken place. Just think its a bit much ...how many more content editors will we loose because they are treated like children? We have to make sure all are treated equally and without malaise. -- Moxy (talk) 17:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule". While it is indeed unfortunate that this exchange occurred, no "malaise" (or malice, for that matter) is involved. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Would be best to take the high-ground over harassing an editor that is clearly here to help. What we are looking for is people that get the bigger picture and understand how to approach each-other. If your not able to get along best both disengage from one and other. As I said before it simply looks bad on your part...as in you have it in for this editor despite the editors wonderful work and effort to get along. -- Moxy (talk) 18:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sound advice, which I'm sure would be helpful to all involved. Returning to the topic of this article: as project guidelines recommend against the inclusion of this template and there have been no contradicting arguments, I suppose the matter is closed. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
