Talk:Variation of Trusts Act 1958

Variation of Trusts Act 1958 has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 8, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 13, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that other than "incapable" beneficiaries, the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 only allows the courts to alter trust documents for potential beneficiaries, not confirmed ones?

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Variation of Trusts Act 1958/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bencherlite ^Talk 11:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this one over the next couple of days, if that's OK. Bencherlite ^Talk 11:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prose - I've made a few, not many, changes. I think the only comment / question I have is this - who is Petre Crowder, and why did he introduce the Act?
A member of Parliament, and no idea. Now fixed. Ironholds (talk)
Broadness / focus / stability / neutrality - all fine
Sources - all look reliable, but I can't spot-check for accuracy / copyvio as most of the article is based on offline sources. Not expecting any problems here, though. The article is well-referenced.
No images, nor would I expect any.

Perhaps just clarify who Crowder is, and double-check my amendments, then it's a GA I think. Bencherlite ^Talk 13:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Good enough for a GA pass, so well done you. Bencherlite ^Talk 17:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]