Talk:Unorthodox Jukebox/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chesnaught555 (talk · contribs) Hello, my name is Chesnaught555, and I am planning to review this article. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The album was initially planned to be more "energetic" than his previous material, Unorthodox Jukebox ultimately presented a wide range of styles, such as reggae rock, disco and soul music." There is a comma splice in the first paragraph, within this sentence. Please correct. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • From Mark Ronson's quote under Recording: "I was only kind of familiar with Mars music." - should this not have an apostrophe? Ronson is referring to Mars' music. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to quick fail this one, MarioSoulTruthFan. I've used Earwig's copyvio detector, which claims 57.4% confidence of a copyright violation. Furthermore, there are quite a few grammatical errors in the article. You have also not edited the article since March 16 2016. Finally, looking at the edit history, I see quite a bit of edit warring between you and another user, Mario Maraschi. I just do not think that this article is at all ready. Please do try again when these problems have been solved. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time reviewing this article Chesnaught555. I will address the first two issues you raised. It was ready by that time (March 16, 2016) hence why I didn't edit no more. That dispute has been solved after some links verification. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
MarioSoulTruthFan, once the criteria have been met, you may nominate this article again, and I will be more than happy to review it. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 13:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chesnaught555 the article went several changes to meet the criteria, it doesn't represent any copy violation, has been submitted to copy-edit in order to reduce the misspelling errors and such. No edit wars going on It's good for a review. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]