Talk:United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The external links seem to be broken. There's already a link in the top frame to the document in unispal.un.org, so perhaps they are obsolete. Dorshil (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two unverified quotes in the "Debates and Discussions"[edit]

Both of the quotes are linked to an incomplete short citation "Boyle & 279-80".

None of them can be found in the linked protocols of the General Assembly meeting, so the accuracy of the quotes cannot be verified.

I suggest that either the citation should be corrected to a long citation, so the quotes authenticity could be confirmed, or the whole section removed. Zlmark (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]