Talk:Two Bad Neighbors/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Plot, "In Springfield, Evergreen Terrace holds a garage sale", this a stupid question, but this sentence makes it seem that everyone from Evergreen Terrace is having a garage sale, if so, you might want to re-word it a bit. In the Background section, "At that point family values were the cornerstone of Bush's campaign platform", add a comma after "point". Same section, this sentence ---> "In that broadcast there was hastily included a new opening", reads very odd. Same section, "Homer, Patty, and Selma sit on couch", sit on couch? In the Writing section, "Oakley said that Bush had been in the office for several years at the point when the episode went into production", this sentence makes it seem that Bush visited the Simpsons writers offices for some reason. If you mean Bush serving as President, you might want to fix the sentence. In the Reception section, "It was named by the Vanity Fair's John Orvted as the show's fifth best episode", remove "the".
- Check.
- In the Plot, "In Springfield, Evergreen Terrace holds a garage sale", this a stupid question, but this sentence makes it seem that everyone from Evergreen Terrace is having a garage sale, if so, you might want to re-word it a bit. In the Background section, "At that point family values were the cornerstone of Bush's campaign platform", add a comma after "point". Same section, this sentence ---> "In that broadcast there was hastily included a new opening", reads very odd. Same section, "Homer, Patty, and Selma sit on couch", sit on couch? In the Writing section, "Oakley said that Bush had been in the office for several years at the point when the episode went into production", this sentence makes it seem that Bush visited the Simpsons writers offices for some reason. If you mean Bush serving as President, you might want to fix the sentence. In the Reception section, "It was named by the Vanity Fair's John Orvted as the show's fifth best episode", remove "the".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Throughout the article, link "Evergreen Terrace", "Frank Grimes", and "Vanity Fair" to their correspondence articles. In the Reception section, why is ---> "Fox NFC Championship - Post Game", italicize?
- Check.
- Throughout the article, link "Evergreen Terrace", "Frank Grimes", and "Vanity Fair" to their correspondence articles. In the Reception section, why is ---> "Fox NFC Championship - Post Game", italicize?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! I think I have addressed all of your concerns. :) TheLeftorium 17:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)