Talk:Tritonal (group)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bio section reads like a press release, not a wikipedia article. Oxryly (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References needed for biography[edit]

Almost the whole biography was written without any references, and I managed to attach references for the majority of them. We still need some of the more obscure claims to be referenced (charts, tour times) for it to be completely accurate.

ANode (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:16bit (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 May 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. After over 2 weeks and a relisting, there's rough consensus to use (group) here. I don't see any specific recommendations at WP:NCMUSIC for disambiguating musical groups, there's not a lot of consistency, and as pointed out, other articles do use (group). Cúchullain ^t/c 17:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tritonal (band) → Tritonal (group) – Tritonal is not a conventional band with physical instruments, they are more of a musical group. aNode (discuss) 16:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose we use (band). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see. May I ask, any reason not to use group though? aNode (discuss) 02:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because (group) can mean a number of things. If anything this would be (duo), but (band) is fine. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per TLC (group). © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 20:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.