Talk:Transgenesis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Transgenesis redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
	This redirect is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Requesting knowledgeable persons[edit]

hi, i only know the basics of transgenesis from school seventh form biology but i was hoping wikipedia would have some more in depth information. any experts please add to it! would be greatly appreciated!

125.237.5.86 (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be merged with Transgene and moved to Transgenics[edit]

The reason is that when referring to the technology or technologies of mixing the genes of different species together, the common term among all scientists and literature is transgenics (noun) or transgenic (adj). The expression "transgenesis" is much less common.

Google: transgenesis 155,000 hits, transgenic or transgenics 11,300,000 hits. THAT'S A NEARLY A 100X FOLD DIFFERENCE (10000%) !!!

Amazon.com: transgenesis has 70 books, transgenics/transgenic has 2770 books (adjective and noun are obviously simultaneously present in all books)

Wikipedia policy indicates preference for least surprise when choosing titles. But since the most common is an adjective, this may be why the original editors were tempted to move it to transgenesis, but this is not a good choice. It is the least relevant term of all to the science of transgenics in general. Since transgene already contains some relevant content, I would suggest they both be merged to a final article called transgenics. Also some of the content from the GMO page would need to be transferred as the GMO page has been very awkwardly handled on the topic.--Tallard (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bahner.matthew (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)I am a University student hoping to make contributions to this page. User:Bahner.matthew/transgenesis[reply]